Video & Transcript Research : 'constitutional amendment'

Page 11 of 500
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Senate in Special Session C Feb 11th, 2025

Florida Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IS CONVENED IN SPECIAL SESSION UNDER ARTICLE III C3 OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION
  • FOR THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 13TH, WITH AN AMENDMENT DEADLINE OF 2 HOURS AFTER THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS
  • WE WANT TO SERVE THOSE TO FILE AMENDMENTS TO SB 2C AND SB 4C.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • What about with constitutional amendments?
  • about with constitutional amendments? about with constitutional amendments?
  • Constitutional amendments are abided by and followed.
  • :37:29.280> by Constitutional amendments are abided by Constitutional amendments are abided by
  • state's convention for a constitutional state's convention for a constitutional amendment<00:44:
Summary: The joint meeting of the House Elections, Constitutional Amendments and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee and the House State Government Committee was called to consider House Concurrent Resolution 45, sponsored by Representative Jason Petri. The resolution would support calling for a federal balanced budget amendment through the Article V process. Petri argued that Kentucky’s own constitutional balanced-budget requirement shows the value of fiscal restraint, and he said decades of federal deficit spending and rising debt make a constitutional amendment necessary. Governor Ron DeSantis and Lauren Ends of the National Campaign for a Balanced Budget Amendment also testified in support, emphasizing the growth of federal debt, the risk of a future debt crisis, and the view that Congress is unlikely to solve the problem on its own. Members asked about the mechanics and risks of an Article V convention, including whether the convention’s “sole purpose” language would be enforceable and whether a convention could become a “runaway” process. DeSantis and Ends said states can impose guardrails on delegates, including criminal penalties and delegate-limitation laws, and noted that any proposed amendment would still require ratification by 38 states. They also said that if Congress chose to draft the amendment itself in response to state pressure, that would be acceptable. One witness said 18 states have passed faithful-delegate or delegate-limitation laws. Representative Callaway asked what would happen if the debt issue is not addressed. Witnesses responded that continued borrowing could lead to economic dislocation, higher interest costs, and a debt crisis that would crowd out other federal spending. They said the current debt burden is already more than $100,000 per U.S. citizen and roughly $300,000 per taxpayer, and that a balanced budget amendment would be a first step toward stopping the growth of debt before any long-term paydown could occur. The transcript provided does not show a final vote or other committee action on the resolution.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, so this is just the statute and not a constitutional amendment.
  • amendment to do that.
  • I would think it'd be worth it to look at a constitutional amendment and perhaps also look at a constitutional
  • And perhaps a limit through constitutional amendment the days during which special issues can be announced
  • amendment for those that run.
Bills: SB 53, SB 54, HB16, SB 19
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Next item on the agenda: SB 3219 proposing amendment 7, section 12 and 13 of the Hawaii State Constitution
  • amendments. Any reservations? amendments. Any reservations?
  • Constitution be amended to authorize counties to issue housing infrastructure growth bonds to fund housing-related
  • "Shall the Hawaii State Constitution be amended to authorize counties to issue housing infrastructure
  • So we do a ballot amendment to, um, enable, clarify in the constitution that we can do these, but then
Summary: The House Housing Committee heard testimony on a series of housing-related Senate bills. SB 2190 SD2 on inclusionary zoning drew support from HHFDC, Hawaii YIMBY, Grassroot Institute, Housing Hawaii’s Future, and Hako Seed Center, with opposition from OHA and Aloha Independent Living Hawaii. SB 2338 SD1, dealing with housing agency personnel authority, received comments from the Attorney General cautioning that the bill should be clarified to avoid conflicts with civil service and collective bargaining laws and recommending removal of a provision limiting employment contracts; HHFDC said its comments addressed those concerns and supported the measure. SB 2424 SD1, concerning HHFDC, received broad support from housing, business, and community groups, with one opposition. Testimony focused on changing the definition of “qualified resident” so people who already own an HHFDC-assisted unit could later purchase another if their housing needs change; HHFDC said the current rule forces people to sell before buying again and that the bill would help people move up the housing ladder and encourage more housing development. SB 2356 on parking also drew broad support from state agencies, housing advocates, business groups, and local officials, with Unite Here Local 5 in opposition. SB 2981 on land use had strong support from many organizations and 67 individuals, with Unite Here Local 5 opposing. SB 3028 SD2 on property conveyance generated the most detailed policy debate. Supporters, including Catholic Charities Hawaii, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, Indivisible Hawaii, and others, backed restructuring the conveyance tax into a marginal rate system and urged changes to revenue allocations, including dedicated funding for homeless services, DHHL, and the rental housing revolving fund. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii supported the marginal-rate concept but opposed dedicated special-fund allocations and criticized the bill’s blank sections. Committee members questioned the historical purpose of the conveyance tax, and the Tax Foundation explained it was originally a modest tax tied to property-value tracking when the state still ran the property tax system. The committee also heard SB 3187 SD2 on off-site construction, SB 2378 SD2 on housing permitting, and SB 2398 SD2 on residential housing utilities. OPSD supported SB 3187 but said it preferred the House version and wanted clarification that off-site certification should apply to factories in Hawaii, not out of state, to avoid outsourcing labor; it also suggested starting with a small scope. SB 2378 SD2 drew support from engineering, housing, and labor groups, with testimony that the House version included needed fixes to make the program insurable. On SB 2398 SD2, the Board of Water Supply opposed the bill, saying it could require disclosure of sensitive infrastructure information beyond ordinary water-availability assessments and raise critical-infrastructure and cybersecurity concerns; developers and housing groups supported the measure. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 7th, 2026 at 09:12 am

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • I want to briefly explain why these proposed constitutional amendments are unnecessary and fiscally irresponsible
  • I bring this amendment without delivering value.
  • In 1965, the Constitution was amended.
  • So, say, for example, these two constitutional amendments, we didn't get to them in this session.
  • Any objection to that amendment? No. Okay. So you have an amended bill. All right.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 14th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • No. 5 by Lambert, proposing a constitutional amendment providing for the creation of a to support the
  • The following amendment the clerk will read the amendment. Amendment by Toth.
  • Toth to explain the amendment. Thank You Mr.
  • The amendment adds crucial data points for the information.
  • Toth sends up an amendment. The amendment is acceptable to the author.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 2nd, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • An amendment placed in Article 9A does not constitute an item of appropriation or a permissible detail
  • H.J.R. 1 by Meyer, proposing a constitutional amendment from ad valerum taxation, a portion of the market
  • Members, House Joint Resolution 1 proposes a constitutional amendment allowing the Legislature to increase
  • Number two by Guerin. proposing a constitutional amendment prohibiting the legislature from imposing
  • Constitution Amendment authorizing the elections for the recall of a member of the Board of Trustees
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 20th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • But what we have is one Constitution, not two constitutions.
  • We believe any sort of change to this system would be required to be done by a constitutional amendment
  • So again, we think it works, and the move here would be, in our opinion, a constitutional amendment.
  • Our founders set up the Constitution and set up this framework.
  • with the authority given under the Texas Constitution.
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs met and heard several bills related to legislative process and court jurisdiction. Senate Bill 1386, by Senator Huffman, would change compelled legislative testimony from blanket transactional immunity to testimonial immunity, allowing compelled statements or documents to be used against a witness in criminal prosecution only if not derived from the compelled testimony, while preserving protection against perjury and false statements and retaining the right to counsel. No public witnesses testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1470, by Chairman Hughes, which would require DPS to share existing data on cross-state driver’s license cancellations with the Secretary of State for voter-roll maintenance. Hughes said the bill does not create new data collection and is intended to improve list maintenance. A DPS resource witness was present, there was no substantive opposition, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1210, also by Hughes, would address conflicts between the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals on constitutional questions by making the Supreme Court the final arbiter in limited circumstances. Chris Hilton supported the bill, but Allen Place, Jack Rohde, and Philip Furlow opposed it, arguing it was unconstitutional, unnecessary, and could create practical problems in criminal post-conviction litigation. The bill was left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 311, which would conform the Government Code to the Texas Constitution by clarifying the Supreme Court’s original writ authority against lower courts and officials other than the governor. Justice Evan Young and Chris Hilton supported the bill as a clarification of existing authority, while no one testified against it; the bill was left pending. The committee then recessed to allow the chamber to rearrange for the Senate session.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Mar 10th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I know there are going to be some amendments because I've gotten some people have asked us to add
  • . amendment.
  • The Constitutional Amendment. We didn't have to do this.
  • finance and here is what I heard and this is what I would hope would be included in this ballot amendment
  • amendment using an H.J.R. to fund this effort entails spending money outside of the regular budget.
Bills: HB5, HJR3, HB155, HB513, HB5, HB155
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Its Constitution further upholds these ideals by ensuring equal protection under the law.
  • Equal Rights Amendment and federal law.
  • A constitutional amendment needs to say that Texas would uphold, protect, and defend parents' fundamental
  • This bill runs afoul of First Amendment protection. and it will surely be challenged in court.
  • Altogether, it risks infringing the First Amendment rights of students.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And I'm, I'm betting that they're going to It would amend Article 1 of our state constitution to expel
  • But in regards to amending the Constitution to allow judges the discretion discretion to deny bail.
  • So I'm going to start off talking about SJR 5 and the constitutional amendment.
  • if this is amended without violating the Bill if this is constitution. constitution. actions of the
  • constitutional amendment pre-trial.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It is vital to recognize that the people who would be most impacted by this amendment are already some
  • undocumented immigrants goes against those principles. and violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment
  • I have serious concerns about SJR 1, in addition to the constitutional and humanitarian issues. issues
  • It would result in over-broad detention and undermine constitutional values and the rights of all Texans
  • SAR 5 enshrines in the Texas Constitution a new provision that would trap black and brown people in jail
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Yes, so last session we passed a bill, a constitutional amendment that approved... ...requiring the counties
  • So this is a cleanup of that particular constitutional amendment, and I think it's a good bill.
  • HCR 34 is the constitution.
  • So I encourage you to add an amendment.
  • So, notwithstanding the POP amendment, or you called it the court... amendment, I don't know.