Video & Transcript Research : 'alcohol testing'

Page 11 of 434
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 28th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I also taught Advanced Placement English, and there are many books on that test that could be banned
  • Khaled Hosseini, and yet these are wonderful works of literature that are on the Advanced Placement test
  • A 16-year-old cannot buy drugs, cannot buy cigarettes, cannot buy alcohol, because they are not mature
Summary: The committee first reopened public testimony on Senate Bill 2713, which concerned protections for freedom of conscience in the context of Realtor association discipline. Texas Realtors representatives testified that their organization is a separate Texas legal entity but affiliated with the National Association of Realtors through a charter and code of ethics. They said Texas Realtors is neutral on SB 2713, that their ethics process is focused on fair housing and equal professional service, and that they have not suspended or terminated anyone in Texas for religious or political speech. Senators pressed them on whether national standards could override Texas law and on examples from other states; the witnesses said state and federal law control and that they would comply with Texas law if the bill passed. Public testimony then closed and SB 2713 was left pending. The committee then took up Senate Bill 1698 on e-cigarettes. Senator Parker explained a committee substitute that tightened enforcement, required distributor registration, expanded regulation to nicotine from any source, added restrictions on child-appealing packaging, authorized inspections and audits, and set compliance deadlines later in 2025 and 2026. After questions, the substitute was adopted and SB 1698, as substituted, was reported favorably to the full Senate on a 6-0 vote, with a recommendation for the local and uncontested calendar. Next, the committee considered Senate Bill 2487 on crisis and mental health facilities. Senator Parker described a substitute that renamed the program a crisis service model, allowed multiple county facilities, added local siting limits, expanded staffing options, shortened clinical timelines, required discharge referrals, directed law enforcement and EMS to transport people there first, and created local boards and expanded reporting. The substitute was adopted and the bill was reported favorably on a 6-0 vote, also recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. Senate Bill 2819, dealing with political activities of county elections administrators, was then reported favorably on a 6-0 vote and likewise sent to the local and uncontested calendar. Senate Bill 2043 was withdrawn. The committee spent substantial time on Senate Bill 2101, which would require municipal public libraries to move sexually explicit materials out of minors’ sections and impose age-verification and review requirements. Supporters argued the bill would protect children from explicit material in public libraries and that libraries should not be left to self-regulate. Opponents, including librarians, parents, authors, and ACLU representatives, argued the definitions were vague, the bill would be costly and burdensome for small libraries, could function as a book ban, and would restrict teens’ access to classics, research materials, and other books. Several witnesses said parents should make those decisions, not the state. The bill’s author said the committee substitute was still being worked on and asked witnesses to review it; public testimony remained open in the portion provided, with no final action on SB 2101 shown.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Veterans and Military Affairs Division 4/15/26

Veterans and Military Affairs Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • And both of us struggled deeply with depression and alcohol and tobacco and just mental health issues
  • And both of us struggled deeply with depression and alcohol and tobacco and just mental health issues
  • <00:50:52.240> and celebrate 5 years free of alcohol and celebrate 5 years free of alcohol
  • We know how to test them, make sure that they're able to be ingested.
  • We know how to test them, make safely.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Mar 5th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do know for a fact when we stopped testing things, the priority for those things to be taught is Lessened
  • That's one thing I recognize in public schools is like, test it all or don't test it. I'm with you.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's like asking students to grade their own test.
  • We'll strengthen those requirements by refining the procedures for public testing, standardizing testing
  • Meaningful testing.
  • True security would require comprehensive penetration testing by cybersecurity experts, testing for false
  • the ability of poll watchers to witness the hash test.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 22nd, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So today when They get results from a paternity test, which indicates whether this is the father or not
  • Currently, when we receive a paternity test result, it has a wide range of information on it.
  • really don't need to know the particular genetic layout; we just need the result of the paternity test
  • We don't have any material at the department, of course, because we are not conducting that blood test
  • The court has ordered a paternity test, right?
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I believe alcohol is an incredibly destructive force in our society.
  • Why is alcohol okay, but THC isn't?
  • It's all tested. They have lab tests. They can't sell that without showing that to us already.
  • In comparison, alcohol kills approximately 178,000 people annually.
  • And I'm not saying this to speak against alcohol.
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Education K-16 (Part II) May 8th, 2025

Education K-16

TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 8th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • And these are long and lengthy tests, like interviews and tests and other things.
  • Um, so this bill clarifies that a person is presumed to be intoxicated if a test shows the blood alcohol
  • The process of calculating blood alcohol content at the time of the offense is based on later test results
  • At times, the blood alcohol tests are, the equipment that's used is either faulty, it's not calibrated
  • But I would say that if you're testing the blood alcohol content level, that's the way it's being calculated
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Mar 31st, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • The UPC code reporting poses challenges for businesses selling alcoholic beverages.
  • There's a requirement to get label approval, both by the Tax and Trade Bureau and the Alcohol and Drug
  • Enforcement Agency. ...Tax and Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau at the federal level, and then
  • So the amount of alcoholic beverages, or the amount of alcohol level and all that?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Mar 17th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • As you all know, our alcohol industry is divided into three tiers.
  • The Alcoholic Beverage Code sets timelines and procedures for when a retailer must pay a wholesaler,
  • We do have a resource witness here from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission.
  • Matthew Cherry with the Alcoholic Beverage Commission, and after Mr.
  • I'm Matthew Cherry, senior counsel for the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission. Thanks, Mr. Chair.
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs resumed consideration of several pending bills, first taking up Senate Bills 667, 1349, 1585, and 2312. After inviting testimony had already been heard, no members of the public came forward to testify on any of those measures, and the committee closed public testimony and left all four bills pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1355, which Senator Parker explained as a committee substitute aimed at helping Texas distillers recover unpaid invoices from wholesalers. The substitute would require distillers to invoice at the time of purchase, send a demand letter if payment terms are violated, and allow complaints to be filed with the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, which could determine an appropriate penalty based on the facts. Natasha Dehart of Bent Distilling Company testified in support, describing serious cash-flow problems and unpaid invoices from a Texas wholesaler that had forced layoffs, late vendor payments, and operational strain. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1378, a narrowly tailored local bill for a Carrollton facility recently acquired by Sazerac that employs more than 1,000 Texans. Senator Parker said the bill would create a limited exemption to avoid forcing the company to shut down or move because of current permit restrictions, while preserving the three-tier system and preventing the company from selling wine to itself. A Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission resource witness said the bill was drafted so it would not open the door to broader industry changes. Mason Moreland testified against the bill as filed, arguing it gave special treatment to one company and failed to address broader problems in the wine industry, including direct-to-consumer sales and permit issues. After questions from senators, public testimony closed and SB 1378 was left pending. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

04/28/2026 - Joint Appropriations

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Finally, the bills continue the requirement that recipients of TANF cash benefits pass a drug test to
  • Finally, the bills continue the requirement that recipients of TANF cash benefits pass a drug test to
  • Finally, the bills continue the requirement that recipients of TANF cash benefits pass a drug test to
Summary: The committee met in a special joint appropriations session to review the FY 2027 budget package, including House Bill 4138 and Senate Bill 1831, the general appropriations or “feed” bills. Staff described the budget as including a one-time transfer of state funds, a 5% lump-sum reduction to most agencies’ discretionary general-fund budgets, continued funding for the state health insurance plan and school facilities, and various one-time restorations or reversions of prior appropriations. Members spent much of the meeting clarifying how the 5% reductions would work, noting that formula and mandatory funding such as K-12 basic aid are excluded, while the governor’s executive branch would decide how to implement the cuts within agencies. The chair repeatedly emphasized that the committee was not specifying line-item cuts and that agencies would have discretion over implementation. A large portion of the discussion focused on the practical effects of the budget on universities, public safety, health care, rural programs, and fund sweeps. Arizona Board of Regents and university representatives said the proposed reductions would amount to more than $85 million statewide and could affect programs such as the Arizona Promise Program, Teachers Academy, and tuition freezes, though no specific program cuts were written into the bill. Other testimony raised concerns about fund sweeps from encumbered balances, including university research funds, housing trust funds, utility regulation funds, and ADOT-related accounts, with some members warning about possible impacts on rural infrastructure and federal matching dollars. The committee also discussed the state employee health plan, including a $228 million general-fund infusion and proposed employee premium increases over three years, as well as questions about corrections, forestry and fire management, and rural critical access hospitals. Public testimony was largely opposed to the budget. Speakers from Opportunity Arizona, the Arizona Board of Regents, health care, and local government argued that the package would reduce support for education, housing, SNAP, health care access, and rural communities while preserving tax benefits for data centers and wealthy taxpayers. A mayor from Globe described severe flood damage and asked for state help for a flood relief fund, while a motorcycle safety advocate questioned a proposed transfer from the motorcycle safety fund. Committee members debated whether the budget’s effects should be described as speculative or as likely consequences of the broad cuts, and several exchanges became contentious over comparisons to the Great Recession and references to federal tax policy. The meeting ended with continued public testimony and no final vote taken in the portion provided, though leadership had earlier said the committee planned a mass roll-call vote on all the bills at the end.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • They're a MAP test, they're an iReady test, they're Star Renaissance testing, or for local control, as
  • Which test? Test number one, test number two, or test number three?
  • So, the original placement test, which is test number one, and then the end test will determine what
  • Of the test.
  • -created test, but no... Not for the private vendor test.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • you know, obviously it's unique to each of each of us, but within hours an individual's DNA can be tested
  • Second, I would expand the definition of genetic test and genetic care.
  • And third, I would expand the definition of genetic test and genetic care characteristic to cover DNA
  • Shortly after birth, most babies in the United States are tested for a variety of genetic. disorders
  • But then my mama asked people to get tested. to see if I could get better blood, and guess what?
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Mar 11th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I've had them reopen the trial, present that DNA evidence, or had it tested with that understanding
  • 32:42.080> it present that DNA evidence or or had it present that DNA evidence or or had it tested
  • > with<00:32:44.480> that<00:32:44.720> understanding<00:32:45.200> that tested
  • uh with that understanding that tested uh with that understanding that if<00:32:45.679> it<00