Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Min, four years ago, his bill failed in the Assembly.
• And then he introduces SB 249 last year, and it fails in the Legislature.
• Three times there have been bills introduced that's failed all three times.
• Senator Min, four years ago, his bill failed in the assembly.
• And then he introduces SB 249 last year and it fails in the legislature.

Summary: The committee met as a subcommittee for much of the hearing because it initially lacked a quorum, then later established one and began taking votes. The state auditor gave a status update on ongoing audits, including several JALAC-requested audits in progress, other statutory audits, staffing growth in his office, and the number of new JALAC audits his office could start in the coming months. The committee also heard that one audit request on Prop. 28 was held, and another PUC-related request was moved off consent and heard on the regular calendar. Members then heard and discussed several audit requests. Senator Cervantes presented a request to audit California fusion centers, with witnesses from the FBI and ACLU supporting the need for transparency and oversight; opponents argued the request was politically motivated and could interfere with counterterrorism work. Senator Allen presented a request on CPUC enforcement of Rule 21 interconnection timelines for solar and storage projects, supported by industry and school representatives who described long delays and financial harm, while CPUC staff said the issue was being addressed through workshops and a formal proceeding. Senator Perez presented a request to audit Caltrans’ administration of the former SR 710 extension properties and affordable sales program, citing tenant complaints about maintenance, pricing, and transparency; Caltrans said it was working to complete sales and improve administration. Senator Umberg presented a request to audit the Orange County Board of Education over transparency, contracting, litigation spending, charter oversight, and whistleblower issues, while board representatives said there was no factual basis for an audit and that existing legal remedies had not been invoked. After quorum was established, the committee approved the consent-calendar DMV license revocation audit and then approved the PUC utility timeliness audit and the Caltrans SR 710 audit. The fusion center audit was left on call after a split vote, and the Orange County Board of Education audit continued with testimony from the board’s representatives after the committee had already moved on to other business.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senator Min, four years ago, his bill failed in the Assembly.
• And then he introduces SB 249 last year, and it fails in the legislature.
• Three times there have been bills introduced that's failed all three times.
• Senator Min, four years ago, his bill failed in the assembly.
• And then he introduces SB 249 last year and it fails in the legislature.

Summary: The committee met as a subcommittee because quorum was initially lacking, and the state auditor gave an update on his office’s workload, including several JALAC audits in progress, other statutory audits, staffing growth, and capacity to begin additional audits. Members also announced that one audit request on Prop. 28 was being held and that the PUC request would be moved off consent for presentation. After quorum was later established, the committee took up and approved several audit requests, including the DMV license revocation audit on consent, the CPUC utility interconnection timeliness audit, and the Caltrans SR 710 extension project audit. The fusion centers audit was approved on call, while the Orange County Board of Education audit was still being discussed when the transcript ended. Senator Cervantes presented the fusion centers audit request, arguing that California’s fusion centers operate with little public oversight and may collect, share, and retain sensitive information without adequate legal authority, privacy protections, or accountability. Supporters, including former FBI agent Mike German and an ACLU representative, said the centers function as opaque intelligence-sharing hubs and have a history of inaccurate or biased reporting. The state auditor said the audit would examine the State Threat Assessment Center and two local fusion centers, focusing on oversight, legal authority, data quality, disclosure controls, use of private vendors, funding, and performance metrics, while noting possible access and public disclosure limits because of intelligence-related information. The request drew sharp criticism from one member, who called it politicized and unnecessary, but it ultimately advanced on call. Senator Allen’s CPUC audit request focused on the commission’s enforcement of Rule 21 interconnection timelines for customer-sited solar and storage projects. Supporters said utilities routinely miss deadlines, causing delays and added costs for schools, nonprofits, businesses, and homeowners, while CPUC staff said the commission has public reporting, workshops, and an active proceeding to address the issue. The auditor said the review would examine CPUC monitoring, enforcement tools, and data on why utilities struggle to comply, estimating about 3,500 hours of work. The committee approved the request after discussion about whether an audit or legislative oversight would be the best tool. Senator Perez and Assembly Member Fong presented the Caltrans 710 corridor audit request, describing tenant complaints about mold, pests, deferred maintenance, inconsistent pricing, unclear communications, and delays in the affordable sales program created under the Roberti Act. Caltrans said it had completed many sales, was moving additional properties, and remained committed to transparency and compliance. The auditor said the review would examine whether Caltrans is complying with the Roberti Act, how it sets affordable prices, appraisal and appeal practices, communications with buyers, rent accounting, property maintenance, and follow-up on prior audit recommendations. The committee also heard Senator Umberg’s request to audit the Orange County Board of Education over transparency, contracting, litigation spending, charter oversight, and whistleblower issues; supporters argued the board’s actions warranted scrutiny, while board representatives said there was no factual basis for an audit and that complaints, enforcement actions, and legal challenges were minimal or absent.

Transcript Highlights:

• We failed on the suicide rates of our children.
• So I'm so happy to remind everybody of the legislation I passed in '23.
• And then again, reading the bill, if we could just go ahead and pass it.
• This is a good bill; it should pass.
• And then another three or four times... ...to pass a bill or to pass a bill because of how it would work

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 16 and 17 without objection. It then heard House Bill 623, which would require a 60-second moment of silence at the beginning of each public school day. The sponsor and several supporters, including a rabbi, a pastor, a church representative, and a former teacher, argued that the bill is neutral, low-cost, and intended to promote calm, reflection, and better student behavior while protecting religious freedom and parental authority. Some members raised concerns about mandating the practice, local control, whether it could be seen as encouraging prayer, and how it would apply to late arrivals or charter schools. The sponsor said it would apply to public and charter schools but not private schools, and that students could silently read or pray if they wished. The committee passed HB 623 on a 10-4 roll call vote and sent it to the floor with a due pass recommendation. The committee then took up House Bill 728, a school funding and staffing definitions bill sponsored by Representative Church. She said the bill would clarify statutory definitions for instructional, administrative, classified, and per-pupil staff, and would move positions that are not directly instructing students into the administrative category, based on LSO review and Department of Education guidance. Supporters said the bill would improve transparency and accountability in how state education dollars are categorized and spent. Questions focused on how the new definitions would affect principals, superintendents, teacher-leaders, mentors, instructional coaches, and rural districts that split duties between teaching and administration. The Idaho Association of School Administrators testified in opposition, warning that the bill would reduce flexibility and could make instructional coaching unsustainable, especially in smaller districts with limited administrative allocations. Members debated whether to hold HB 728 for further clarification or move it forward. A substitute motion to hold the bill until February 27 failed on a 6-8 roll call. The committee then voted on the original motion to send HB 728 to the floor with a due pass recommendation, and that motion passed unanimously on the recorded vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• They're going to brief us on the implementation of HB 121, which passed in 2003.
• We have Medicaid, just passed in 1965. The Florida program began in 1970.
• You guys passed the bill.
• To begin, thank you for your leadership in passing House Bill 121 in 2023.
• To begin, thank you for your leadership in passing House Bill 121 and 2023.

Summary: The committee received a briefing from AHCA Deputy Secretary Brian Meyer and Florida Healthy Kids CMO Ashley Carr on implementation of HB 121, which was enacted in 2023 to expand Florida’s KidCare/CHIP eligibility from 200% to 300% of the federal poverty level and replace the sharp premium “benefits cliff” with a tiered premium glide path. Sponsor Rep. Bartleman described the bill as a bipartisan effort to help working families keep children insured while moving toward economic self-sufficiency. The presenters explained that the program remains a joint federal-state structure, with Medicaid unchanged and the bill affecting only the CHIP-related portions of KidCare. AHCA said implementation has been delayed by federal CMS actions. The agency reported that CMS first rejected a state plan amendment approach, then required revisions to the premium tiers under a new maintenance-of-effort interpretation, and later issued a new interpretation of continuous 12-month eligibility that would prevent disenrollment for nonpayment of premiums. AHCA said it submitted an 1115 waiver, but negotiations over special terms and conditions reached an impasse, and the state has filed litigation challenging CMS’s interpretation. Members asked about the cost of litigation, the effect on future bills, the review process for CMS documents, disenrollment and reenrollment rules, and whether any additional legislative action is needed; AHCA said no further state action is needed at this time and that the key issue is the pending federal litigation. Several members and the sponsor emphasized the need for immediate implementation and asked about possible interim relief. AHCA said current coverage remains in place under the preexisting program, that there is a 30-day grace period for premium payment, and that reenrollment does not require a penalty or back payment, though coverage is not active during lapsed periods. The committee also heard public comment from Nicholas Hessing of the Children’s Services Council of Broward County and the Florida Alliance of Children’s Councils and Trusts, who supported HB 121 and said the expansion could make about 17,600 additional children eligible in Broward County alone. The meeting ended with Rep. Bartleman thanking staff and expressing hope that the new federal administration would allow the program to move forward, and the chair adjourned the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• conduct this program because this program is broken and it puts our communities at risk with each passing
• to appear for therapy sessions, failing to take medication, or failing to submit to drug screenings.
• the auditor's comments, 18 people were returned to the Department of State Hospitals because they failed
• In fact, we prefer having a failure because someone failed a term and condition rather than progressed
• establishment of this pro-social life is part of a rehabilitation process that hopefully they can pass

Summary: The Joint Legislative Audit Committee held an oversight hearing on the state auditor’s October 2024 report on California’s Forensic Conditional Release Program (CONREP) for sexually violent predators. Members and witnesses discussed public safety, the long delays in finding community housing, the role of local housing committees, and the Department of State Hospitals’ oversight of Liberty Healthcare, which operates much of the program. Several legislators from rural and high-desert districts said their communities have been disproportionately affected by placements and questioned why many placements end up in remote areas. State Auditor Grant Parks said the audit found that CONREP participants were convicted of new offenses less often than sexually violent predators who were unconditionally released, but that 18 of 56 participants had been revoked and returned to state hospitals for noncompliance. He said it took an average of 17 months to place current participants in the community, with 20 additional people awaiting placement for an average of 20 months, and that the program incurred significant pre-placement costs. Parks also said local officials were often unclear about their role, DSH had not given clear guidance at the time of the audit, and California lacks a transitional housing option used in some other states. He reported that DSH had implemented four of the five audit recommendations, while declining the recommendation to explore state-owned transitional housing. DSH Director Stephanie Clendendon and Liberty representative Ken Carabello defended the program as a court-ordered, highly supervised treatment model intended to reduce reoffending and support reintegration. They said DSH is actively involved in placement review, that Liberty searches countywide under statutory restrictions, and that community feedback and court approval are part of the process. DSH said it has now implemented guidance for housing committee designees, formal program reviews, an outcome tracker, and an analysis of whether to separate some Liberty services into different contracts. DSH continued to oppose transitional housing, arguing it would not solve the core siting and statutory problems and would add cost. Several members remained critical, arguing the program is broken, costly, and unfairly concentrated in certain communities, and some called for major statutory changes or suspension of the program.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> great deal of The Travelers that pass great deal of The Travelers that pass through<00:14:18.560
• </c> time Luciana and her son were failed time Luciana and her son were failed then<00:26:21.320><c>
• </c> have I don't want to see the bill fail have I don't want to see the bill fail because<00:47:13.400
• pass on Bill Bill Bill 12 12 12 second<01:58:13.760><c> okay</c> All those in favor of an ought to pass
• </c> could probably pass could probably pass today<02:04:31.480><c> or</c><02:04:31.800><c> discussed

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• As the bill passed and during committee, when it passed and when the governor signed it into law last
• it passed when the governor um when it passed when the governor signed<00:56:49.560><c> it</c><00:56
• I think we over 30, we almost 40 states have passed this.
• I think we over 30, we almost 40 states have passed this.
• </c> leaves his place of employment or fails leaves his place of employment or fails to to to neglects

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> lender mediation, which has passed lender mediation, which has passed unanimously<00:01:58.240><
• </c> pass and sent to the floor. pass and sent to the floor.
• Um, and so failing to have policies, failing to communicate those policies, failing to train on those
• so failing to have policies, failing<01:30:20.560><c> to</c><01:30:20.639><c> communicate</c><01:30:
• </c> without passing this law? without passing this law? Commissioner<01:41:35.679><c> Lucero.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> &gt;&gt; The question is shall the bill pass? &gt;&gt; The question is shall the bill pass?
• </c> &gt;&gt; The question is shall the bill pass? &gt;&gt; The question is shall the bill pass?
• </c> have it and you have passed the bill. have it and you have passed the bill.
• </c> &gt;&gt; The question is, shall the bill pass? &gt;&gt; The question is, shall the bill pass?
• </c> have it, and you have passed the bill. have it, and you have passed the bill.

Keywords: 926, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Twenty-eight states have already passed a similar resolution.
• The Legislature would simply refuse to pass it.
• But our Congress has failed to balance the budget, and they failed miserably in their fiscal responsibility
• I move to send HCR 25 to the floor with the due pass recommendation.
• Motion fails 9 to 4.

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from January 29 and 30. It then took up HCR 25, a resolution calling for an Article V convention effort focused on a balanced budget amendment. The sponsor and supporters argued that the federal debt and annual deficits are unsustainable, that the resolution is intended to pressure Congress rather than actually trigger a runaway convention, and that any amendment would still require ratification by 38 states. Supporters also said a balanced budget amendment would force fiscal discipline without immediate tax hikes or drastic cuts, and several public witnesses, including former officials, a banker, a student, and party leaders, testified in favor on generational and economic grounds. Opponents and skeptical members raised concerns that the resolution explicitly calls for a constitutional convention, that there is no reliable way to limit the scope or delegate selection, and that a convention could create unintended constitutional changes. Some questioned whether the strategy was honest with constituents, whether Congress should instead be changed through elections, and whether states like Idaho should continue accepting federal funds while advocating fiscal restraint. The Idaho Republican Party chair testified against the measure, saying the risk of an uncontrolled convention outweighed any benefit. After debate, Representative Boyle moved a substitute motion to hold HCR 25 in committee, but that motion failed 9-4. The committee then voted on the original motion to send HCR 25 to the floor with a due pass recommendation, and that motion passed 9-4. The committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• There being 145 ayes and 0 nays, Senate Bill 687 is finally passed. Passed.
• There being 145 ayes and 0 nays, Senate Bill 4 is passed. It is passed to third reading.
• We just passed, or you just passed, dozens of MUDs in our state. And guess what?
• This bill passed the Senate unanimously.
• This is his bill that passed the Senate.

Bills: SB4, SB23, SB3, SJR2, SJR85, SB34, SB60, SB75, SB706, SB1814, SB1220, SB523, SB565, SB1253, SB840, SB764, SB2383, SB2155, SB1535, SB1405, SB1423, SB1566, SB1804, SB1728, SB1816, SB1952, SB1948, SB2037, SB2068, SB1455, SB213, SB243, SB627, SB646, SB670, SB896, SB917, SB1184, SB971, SB1255, SB1261, SB1283, SB1358, SB991, SB1733, SB21, SB231, SB739, SB1252, SB1371, SB664, SB40, SB9, SJR1, SB687, SB1332, SB458, SB482, SB927, SB984, SB651, SB1620, SB2124, SB2448, SB841, SB843, SB402, SB2662, SB2053, SB2332, SB2112, SB745, SB1247, SB1789, SB27, SB207, SB2938, SB1901, SB1227, SB1248, SB912, SB1321, SB2143, SB2145, SB1497, SB1239, SB2180, SB1388, SB1662, SB1951, SB1537, SB493, SB378, SB1020, SB1018, SB992, SB958, SB920, SB1350, SB1762, SB552, HCR109, SB2185, SB4, SB23, SB3, SJR2, SJR85, SB34, SB60, SB75, SB706, SB1814, SB1220, SB523, SB565, SB1253, SB840, SB764, SB2383, SB2155, SB1535, SB1405, SB1423, SB1566, SB1804, SB1728, SB1816, SB1952, SB1948, SB2037, SB2068, SB1455, SB213, SB243, SB627, SB646, SB670, SB896, SB917, SB1184, SB971, SB1255, SB1261, SB1283, SB1358, SB991, SB1733, SB21, SB231, SB739, SB1252, SB1371, HB2970, HB 109, SB2308

Keywords: property tax, homestead exemption, school funding, state aid, constitutional amendment, elderly, disabled, ad valorem taxation, school district funding, SJR 2, Senate Joint Resolution 2, property tax relief, school property tax, ad valorem tax, residence homestead, school district taxes, Texas Constitution Article VIII, public school finance, homeowner exemption, elderly exemption

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, ultimately that amendment failed.
• Uh, ultimately that amendment failed.
• Uh that is why uh we decided as failed.
• pass some of<00:04:54.320><c> these</c><00:04:54.840><c> bills.
• will pass.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We say we want to pass a bill, and that's it. So I've...
• Oh, I was going to pass over to John Ford, but did you have more to say?
• It was a failed commission, but...
• So our recommendations were passing S. 478, the disclosure bill, updating the consumer guide.
• Well, Senator Jalen mentioned a failed commission. What's the definition of a failed commission?

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The commission met to review its draft final report on continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), with most of the discussion focused on whether recommendations required unanimous consensus and how to handle disagreements in the report. Members agreed that consensus meant no stated opposition, and several participants argued that unresolved issues should still be described in the report rather than omitted. The chairs said the report would include agreed-upon recommendations, note areas without consensus, and preserve written comments or dissent letters submitted by members. The draft report’s findings and slides were reviewed charge by charge, including CCRC definitions, financial condition, entrance fee refunds, regulatory oversight, advertising practices, and closure/change-of-ownership procedures. Members suggested several factual and wording edits, including clarifying financial data sources, correcting a presenter’s name, refining language about entrance fee use and refund timing, and revising statements about Attorney General authority and CCRC advertising. There was also discussion about the need to distinguish nonprofit and for-profit CCRCs and to better explain how different care levels and licensing structures are described. On recommendations, the commission kept the proposal to advance the disclosure bill (S. 478) and update the consumer guide, but removed a recommendation for annual open board meetings after objections that it was inadequate. The group spent considerable time debating whether to recommend resident representation on CCRC boards, timely refund requirements for entrance fees, and possible state registration or definition changes for CCRCs, but no consensus was reached on those items. The chairs said the final report would be completed by the statutory August 1 deadline, with final written comments due before then and the report and meeting materials posted on the legislature website.

Transcript Highlights:

• that law enforcement officers who transfer agencies can rely on a previous physical if the new agency fails
• So I'm going to pass the gavel. Senators, I'm going to present SB 354.
• Senator Musulo will take over the chair, so I'm passing him the virtual gavel. Thank you, Mr.
• The Community Planning Act was The Community Planning Act was passed in the legislature in 2011.
• So have we passed a couple bills over the last couple of years that speak to the drawing and issuing

Summary: The committee heard and advanced several bills. SB 330, by Sen. Bradley, clarified the heart disease presumption for firefighters, law enforcement, and correctional officers, including allowing a prior physical exam to count if a transferring officer is not given a new one; an amendment declaring the act an important state interest was adopted, and the bill passed favorably. SB 594, by Sen. Burton, would make mobile home residents eligible for local housing assistance programs such as SHIP for lot rent and home repairs; it received supportive testimony from manufactured-home advocates and passed favorably. SB 840, by Sen. DeSigley, revised hurricane-related land-use restrictions from prior legislation by shortening the affected area from 100 miles to 50 miles, ending certain temporary limits on June 30, 2026, and exempting some water, flood, and state/federal planning matters; it passed favorably after supportive comments from local-government interests and members noting the need to fix unintended consequences of prior law. The committee also approved SB 526, by Sen. Grawe, which addresses no-damages-for-delay clauses in public construction contracts, creates a uniform commercial permit application, requires permit fee reductions when private providers are used, and adds mitigation to statewide product approval categories. County representatives testified with concerns about the contracting language, unfunded mandates, and fee reductions, but the bill passed favorably. SB 504, by Sen. Burgess, creates a statewide framework for code inspector body camera use, and SB 506, its linked public-records bill, exempts certain sensitive content from disclosure; both passed favorably with support from the sponsor and no opposition in committee. The most heavily debated measure was SB 354, by Chair McLean, which creates a “blue ribbon project” framework for very large developments that trade state preemption over local land-use regulation for reserving at least 60% of the land for conservation, agriculture, recreation, utilities, and related uses. The bill drew significant testimony from environmental groups, counties, smart-growth advocates, and local residents who argued it could weaken local control, reduce public review, and allow sprawl or inadequate infrastructure planning; supporters argued it could help address housing needs and preserve large amounts of land. The committee adopted two amendments clarifying reserve-area easements and requiring certain easements to be granted without charge, and the committee then reported the bill favorably, with some senators noting they supported it in concept but wanted further changes before later stops.

Transcript Highlights:

• IT WAS SAID AND I FAILED TO SAY IT. AI RESENTS SO MANY POSITIVES.
• SINCE WE HAVE SEEN DIGITAL RIGHT TO REPAIR BILLS PASS IN OTHER STATES.
• SOLUTIONS FOUND THAT 88% OF AFTERMARKET BATTERY BRANDS FAILED TO MEET REGIONAL SAFETY STANDARDS.
• IF THIS PASSES, WHAT DOES THE WAIVER LOOK LIKE?
• CAPITALISM, THE WHOLE SYSTEM HAS FAILED THAT 40-YEAR-OLD.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It passed 35 nothing in the Senate. We made some amendments over here in the House.
• It passed really well there with some changes, but because at end of the session and some differences
• Many states have passed laws attempting to protect minors. Young developing minds of children.
• Many states have passed laws attempting to protect minors and harm caused by addictive social media.
• These laws are constantly failing when challenged in court due to First Amendment rights.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first considered RS 33104, a proposal related to temporary rules. The sponsor said it was the same language as a bill from the prior session, with only the year changed, and explained that it would require a statement of necessity for temporary rules and limit repeated reissuance after legislative rejection. Representative Palmer moved to introduce the RS, and the committee approved the motion. The committee then took up RS 32976 C1, a bill from Representative Crane aimed at protecting minors from harmful social media practices. Crane described concerns about youth suicide, addiction to phones and social media, and the use of addictive platform features to target children. He said the bill would require social media companies to verify a child’s age and give parents more control, while trying to withstand First Amendment challenges. Representative Mickelsen asked why the bill used age 15, and after discussion he moved to introduce the RS with all references to age 15 changed to 16. Crane said 16 was a more appropriate threshold, and other members spoke in support, saying the legislature has protected children physically but not enough in the cyber world. The committee approved the motion to introduce RS 32976 C1 with the age changes. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• It passed 35-0 in the Senate. We made some amendments over here in the House.
• It passed really well there with some changes, but because at the end of the session and some differences
• Many states have passed laws attempting to protect minors.
• Many states have passed laws attempting to protect minors and harm caused by addictive social media.
• These laws are constantly failing when challenged in court due to First Amendment rights.

Summary: The House State Affairs Committee first heard RS 33104, a proposal to revise temporary rule procedures. The sponsor said it was the same concept as a bill from the prior session that passed the Senate 35-0 but did not finish the process, and explained that the measure would require a statement of necessity for temporary rules and limit repeated reissuance after legislative rejection. The committee moved to introduce RS 33104 and approved that motion without objection. The committee then considered RS 32976 C1, a bill aimed at protecting minors from harmful effects of social media. The sponsor argued that addictive platform features contribute to youth mental health problems, including suicide and bullying, and said the bill is intended to let parents control children’s online access while surviving First Amendment challenges. Members asked about the age threshold in the draft, and the sponsor explained the original choice of 15 as a child age benchmark tied to driving age and other Idaho law. Representative Mickelson moved to introduce the bill with all references to age 15 changed to 16, and several members spoke in support, saying the state has protected children physically but not adequately in the cyber world. The sponsor described the bill’s mechanics as requiring large social media platforms to verify a child’s age and use their targeting technology in a way that protects minors. The committee approved the motion to introduce RS 32976 C1 with the age changes, and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• I declare the bill to have passed.
• I declare the bill to have passed. Thank you, Mr.
• The bill is declared to pass.
• bill to have failed.
• I declare the bill to have passed.

Bills: HB2059, HB3920, HB2992, HB3267, HB4457, HB3800, HB3818, HB4425, HB4427, HB4430, HB4431, HB4333, HB4340, HB4343, HB4344, HB4363, HB4229, HB4230, HB4236, HB4246, HB1979, HB3431, HB3052, HB3047, HB3048, HB4092, HB4302, HB3261, HB3704, HB3312, HB3546, HB3849, HCR1021, HB4105, HB4159, HB4304, HB3835, HB3619, HB4490, HB3710, HB4201, HB3907, HB3748

Keywords: health care, medication, inmates, Oklahoma Health Care Authority, reimbursement, county jails, medical expenses, sales tax exemption, nonprofit organizations, procurement, transplant research, Oklahoma Tax Code, HB2992, Data Center Customer Ratepayer Protection Act of 2026, Corporation Commission, Oklahoma utilities, ratepayer protection, data centers, artificial intelligence computing, AI data centers

Transcript Highlights:

• 03:02.879><c> pay</c><00:03:03.040><c> for</c> companies are failing to pay for companies are failing
• This is also not an access issue that needs to be addressed if Senate File 3769 failed to pass.
• </c><01:48:11.199><c> This</c><01:48:11.440><c> is</c> Senate File 3769 failed to pass.
• This is Senate File 3769 failed to pass.
• Uh, thank you for passing this Senate. Uh, thank you for passing the<02:08:59.920><c> bill.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> five requires the credit to be passed five requires the credit to be passed through<00:19:03.200
• So, I I I come to pass either.
• </c> County Board have recently passed County Board have recently passed resolutions<01:14:50.560><c>
• Thank you. faced challenges in passing operating faced challenges in passing operating referendums.<01
• </c><01:32:50.560><c> much</c> increasingly difficult to pass much increasingly difficult to pass much

Keywords: 1187, senate, all