Oregon 2024 Regular Session

Oregon Senate Bill SB1568

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/5/24  
Report Pass
2/15/24  
Engrossed
2/19/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Enrolled
3/5/24  
Passed
3/27/24  
Chaptered
3/28/24  

Caption

Relating to a prevailing rate of wage for electrical workers; and prescribing an effective date.

Impact

The implications of SB 1568 on state laws are significant, as it introduces a standardized method for determining the prevailing wage specific to electrical workers. By basing the prevailing wage on the highest rates established in collective bargaining agreements available within localities, this bill aims to uphold labor standards while protecting the earners in the electrical trades. The emphasis on yearly assessments and potential adjustments to the wage rates represents a proactive approach to wage equity in the field.

Summary

Senate Bill 1568 seeks to establish a mechanism for determining the prevailing rate of wage for electrical workers in Oregon. The bill amends existing provisions in Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) related to the wage determination process, mandating that the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries assess and publish prevailing wage rates at least twice a year. This measure aims to ensure that wage rates reflect fair compensation based on current labor market conditions and collective bargaining agreements.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 1568 appears to be supportive, particularly among labor groups and unions representing electrical workers. Proponents argue that the bill will enhance fairness and accountability in wage determination and bolster protections for workers. However, there is a cautious sentiment expressed among some employers who worry about potential increases in labor costs emanating from the new wage determination process, expecting it could impact overall project budgets and competitiveness.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the reliance on collective bargaining agreements as a basis for establishing wage rates. Critics of the bill argue that in areas where such agreements are not prevalent, imposing a wage based on potentially higher union rates could inadvertently disadvantage employers or lead to job migration to regions with lower labor costs. This delineation raises questions about how best to balance worker protections with business viability, particularly in varied economic contexts across the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR HB2688

Relating to the application of a prevailing rate of wage to off-site custom work for use in public works; and prescribing an effective date.

OR SB1566

Relating to the prevailing rate of wage; prescribing an effective date.

OR SB758

Relating to the application of a prevailing rate of wage to offsite custom work for use in public works; prescribing an effective date.

OR SB460

Relating to an exemption of pre-apprenticeship participants from the application of the prevailing rate of wage; prescribing an effective date.

OR SB01370

An Act Requiring Workers Performing Off-site Custom Fabrication For A Public Works Project To Be Paid Prevailing Wage Rates.

OR SB990

Relating to exempting certain jurisdictions within the state from the requirement to pay a prevailing rate of wage.

OR HB2962

Relating to minimum wage rates; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB345

AN ACT relating to prevailing wage.

OR SB518

Public works contracts; prevailing wage rate, definitions, civil penalty.

OR HB569

Public works contracts; prevailing wage rate, definitions, civil penalty.

Similar Bills

AL HB443

Article V Convention; process for appointing commissioners and alternate commissioners to represent the State of Alabama at Article V Convention established

CT SJ00039

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

TN HB1499

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 18, relative to Article V conventions.

TN SB1567

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3, Chapter 18, relative to Article V conventions.

CT SJ00058

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

CA AB1936

Insurance Commissioner qualifications.

MI HCR0002

A concurrent resolution prescribing the Rules of the Legislature for Selecting Commissioners to an Article V Convention.

CA AB1931

Insurance: home protection companies.