New York Senate Bill S10133

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/30/26
• Refer: 4/30/26

Caption

Prohibits the use of most artificial intelligence in classrooms prior to high school except for AI used for diagnostic purposes or explicit instruction interventions for students with disabilities.

Summary

S10133 would amend the New York Education Law to create a new section prohibiting the use of most artificial intelligence in classrooms before ninth grade. The bill defines artificial intelligence broadly as machine-based systems that make decisions using algorithms, machine learning, or other data-driven modeling. Under the proposal, AI could not be used for general classroom instruction in grades below high school, but it would still be allowed for diagnostic purposes and for explicit instructional interventions for students with disabilities. The bill also preserves the ability of teachers, administrators, and other school personnel to use AI for administrative and planning tasks. In addition, the Commissioner of Education would be required to provide school districts with guidance on permissible uses and best practices. The measure would take effect on July 1 following enactment, with immediate authorization for any needed implementing regulations.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would add a new restriction to the Education Law limiting classroom use of artificial intelligence in pre-high school settings statewide. It would affect public school districts and other schools covered by the Education Law by barring most AI-based instructional tools in grades K-8, while carving out exceptions for disability-related interventions and diagnostic uses. The bill would also direct the state education commissioner to issue guidance, shaping how districts interpret and comply with the new limits.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes, the overall sentiment appears precautionary and regulatory rather than oppositional or celebratory. The proposal reflects concern about the use of AI in younger students' classrooms, while still acknowledging limited educational and administrative uses. No formal voting history or transcript record is available here to show broader support or resistance.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely the scope of the AI ban and how broadly the term "artificial intelligence" is defined, since the bill covers a wide range of machine-based systems. Another likely issue is the balance between restricting classroom AI use for younger students and preserving exceptions for students with disabilities and for school administration. Supporters would likely emphasize child development, privacy, and instructional caution, while critics may argue the bill is too restrictive or could limit useful educational technology.