Relates to interest to be recovered upon a sum awarded in certain circumstances.
Summary
This bill amends section 5001 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules to expand the circumstances in which prejudgment interest is recoverable. Under current law, interest is recoverable on sums awarded for breach of contract and for certain property-related claims; this bill adds bodily injury claims to that list. It also specifies that, in all bodily injury cases, interest must be computed from the date of injury or loss rather than from a later date chosen in the verdict or decision.
The practical effect is to increase the amount of damages available in personal injury cases by ensuring that injured plaintiffs can recover interest from the time the injury occurred. The bill would change how courts and clerks calculate awards in bodily injury actions and would apply immediately upon enactment. It would affect litigants in tort cases, especially plaintiffs seeking compensation for medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other injury-related losses.
Impact
The bill would amend New York’s civil procedure rules governing prejudgment interest, specifically CPLR 5001(a) and (c). By adding bodily injury to the categories of actions where interest is recoverable and requiring interest to run from the date of injury or loss, it would alter damage calculations in personal injury litigation and likely increase monetary awards in those cases. Courts, clerks, insurers, and defendants in bodily injury actions would be directly affected by the revised interest computation rule.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record was provided, so there is no documented legislative debate or recorded vote to assess. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears straightforward and remedial, aimed at making injured parties whole by compensating for the time value of money from the date of injury. There is no evidence in the supplied materials of formal opposition or support, but the proposal would likely be viewed favorably by plaintiff-side advocates and more cautiously by insurers and defense interests because it could increase liability exposure.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely to be whether prejudgment interest should begin at the date of injury in all bodily injury cases, which can significantly raise total awards. Supporters would argue that injured plaintiffs should be compensated for the delay in receiving damages, while opponents—typically insurers, tort defendants, and some business interests—may argue that the change increases litigation costs and creates larger, less predictable exposure. Because no hearing transcript is available, no specific member or stakeholder positions are documented in the provided materials.
Establishes rebuttable presumption against granting child custody under certain circumstances; expands best interests factors; adds coercive control to domestic violence definition.
Clarifies notice required to be provided to property taxpayers of change in interest rate on delinquent property taxes under certain emergency circumstances; permits municipality to extend grace period under certain emergency circumstances.