Relates to interest to be recovered upon a sum awarded in certain circumstances.
Summary
This bill amends New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules section 5001 to expand the circumstances in which prejudgment interest is recoverable. Under current law, interest is generally recoverable on awards for breach of contract and for certain property-related claims, and the bill adds bodily injury claims to that list. It also specifies that in all bodily injury cases, interest must be computed from the date of injury or loss, rather than leaving the start date to be determined case by case.
The practical effect is to increase the amount of money awarded in many personal injury cases by requiring interest to accrue from the time the injury occurred. The bill would affect litigants, insurers, and defendants in bodily injury actions, as well as courts and clerks responsible for calculating judgments. It would also make the interest calculation rule more uniform for these cases by removing judicial discretion over the start date for interest in bodily injury matters.
Impact
The bill would amend CPLR 5001 to expressly include bodily injury actions among those eligible for prejudgment interest and to mandate that such interest run from the date of injury or loss. This changes state law by creating a specific statutory rule for personal injury awards, rather than relying on the existing general framework for contract and property claims and the court’s discretion in equitable actions. The change would likely increase damages in bodily injury cases and affect settlement values, judgment amounts, and insurance exposure.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record is provided, so there is no recorded legislative debate or roll-call evidence of support or opposition in the supplied materials. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears straightforward and remedial, aimed at standardizing compensation for bodily injury claimants by ensuring interest accrues from the time harm occurs. The available context does not show any formal controversy or amendments.
Contention
The main point of contention, if any, would likely be the financial impact on defendants and insurers, since requiring interest from the date of injury can materially increase awards in personal injury litigation. Supporters would likely view the bill as a fairness measure that better compensates injured parties for the time value of money lost while claims are pending. Because no discussion transcript or vote history is included, no specific legislators, committees, or stakeholder groups are identified as having raised objections or support.
Establishes rebuttable presumption against granting child custody under certain circumstances; expands best interests factors; adds coercive control to domestic violence definition.
Clarifies notice required to be provided to property taxpayers of change in interest rate on delinquent property taxes under certain emergency circumstances; permits municipality to extend grace period under certain emergency circumstances.