Relates to establishing requirements and penalties for combination utility companies during service outages; provides that a penalty for failure to reasonably comply with requirements that protect the overall reliability and continuity of combination utility company services shall be up to one hundred dollars per violation or for a pattern or practice of such violations up to one thousand dollars per violation.
Summary
Bill S01535 aims to amend the public service law in New York by establishing specific requirements and penalties for combination utility companies during service outages. The bill empowers the commission to set standards for acceptable performance in power restoration and mandates penalties for non-compliance. These penalties can be up to $100 per violation, with a maximum of $1,000 for repeated violations, and apply to both residential and commercial customers. Additionally, the bill requires the commission to create a schedule of customer credits or rebates for those affected by service outages or missed installation appointments.
Impact
If enacted, this bill will significantly impact the operational standards of combination utility companies in New York, particularly in cities with populations exceeding one million. It will enforce stricter accountability measures for service outages, ensuring that utility companies adhere to established emergency response plans. The financial implications of penalties and customer rebates will not be passed on to consumers, thereby protecting customers from increased utility costs associated with non-compliance.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding Bill S01535 appears to be generally supportive, as indicated by the voting history. The bill passed through committee votes and final Senate votes with a majority in favor, suggesting that there is a recognition of the need for improved utility service reliability and accountability. However, the presence of dissenting votes indicates some concerns among legislators regarding the implications of the proposed penalties and the operational burden on utility companies.
Contention
Points of contention primarily revolve around the potential financial impact on utility companies and the feasibility of implementing the required performance standards. Some legislators express concern that the penalties may lead to increased operational costs for utility companies, which could ultimately affect service rates for consumers. Others argue that the bill is essential for ensuring accountability and improving service reliability during outages, reflecting a divide in perspectives on regulatory approaches to utility management.
Same As
Relates to establishing requirements and penalties for combination utility companies during service outages; provides that a penalty for failure to reasonably comply with requirements that protect the overall reliability and continuity of combination utility company services shall be up to one hundred dollars per violation or for a pattern or practice of such violations up to one thousand dollars per violation.
Relates to establishing requirements and penalties for combination utility companies during service outages; provides that a penalty for failure to reasonably comply with requirements that protect the overall reliability and continuity of combination utility company services shall be up to one hundred dollars per violation or for a pattern or practice of such violations up to one thousand dollars per violation.
Relates to establishing requirements and penalties for combination utility companies during service outages; provides that a penalty for failure to reasonably comply with requirements that protect the overall reliability and continuity of combination utility company services shall be up to one hundred dollars per violation or for a pattern or practice of such violations up to one thousand dollars per violation.
Increases the monetary penalties for the crimes of aggravated harassment in the first or second degrees or for discrimination; provides that such penalty shall be not less than five hundred dollars nor more than twenty-five hundred dollars for the first violation and not less than twenty-five hundred dollars nor more than twelve thousand five hundred dollars for each subsequent violation.
Increases the penalty of knowingly violating the provisions relating to the appropriate shelter for dogs from a violation to a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by a fine not less than five hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars, or by both.
Prohibits the taking of zoo, petting zoo, carnival or circus animals; provides that violations shall be punishable by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars nor more than two thousand dollars.
Increases the maximum amount of fines for parking violations from fifty dollars to sixty-five dollars for a first violation, eighty-five dollars for a second parking violation, and one hundred dollars for each subsequent violation.
Limits certain charging practices by companies that provide prepaid telephone calling cards and increases fines for violations of limitation requirements
Increases the penalty of knowingly violating the provisions relating to the appropriate shelter for dogs from a violation to a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by a fine not less than five hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars, or by both.
Requires the clear and conspicuous disclosure of pricing changes for online grocery delivery and online pick-up services; imposes a fine of not more than one hundred dollars for the first offense and not more than two hundred fifty dollars for a second and each subsequent offense for violations.
Requires the clear and conspicuous disclosure of pricing changes for online grocery delivery and online pick-up services; imposes a fine of not more than one hundred dollars for the first offense and not more than two hundred fifty dollars for a second and each subsequent offense for violations.