New York Assembly Bill A08328

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/13/25
• Refer: 5/13/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Provides that the future siting and construction of battery energy storage systems and related facilities, systems, infrastructure, and substations of any scale and possessing any storage capacity, and including, but not limited to, those deploying lithium-ion batteries, are prohibited on Long Island, in the counties of Suffolk and Nassau.

Impact

The enactment of A08328 is expected to have significant implications for energy regulation in New York State, particularly for regions like Long Island where environmental and public safety concerns are paramount. The bill seeks to protect local communities by preventing the establishment of potentially hazardous energy storage facilities near homes, schools, and other public areas. By restricting such developments, the bill reflects an emphasis on safeguarding resident safety and ensuring that public health is not compromised by the operations of these energy systems.

Summary

Bill A08328 is a legislative proposal aimed at prohibiting the siting and construction of battery energy storage systems and related facilities on Long Island, particularly in the counties of Suffolk and Nassau. This proposal arises from a concern over the potential adverse effects associated with these energy storage systems, such as air pollution and the risk of explosions. The bill explicitly states that no permits will be issued for the construction of these facilities, which includes those utilizing lithium-ion batteries, with certain exceptions allowed for small-scale residential applications and industrial zones.

Contention

The bill may face contention from stakeholders interested in the advancement of renewable energy and battery storage technology, who might argue that such a prohibition could hinder efforts to transition to greener energy solutions. Proponents may advocate for a more nuanced approach that involves stringent safety regulations rather than an outright ban. This debate could center around balancing the need for energy innovation with the necessity of protecting communities from associated risks, highlighting the complexities of energy policy in the state.