New York Assembly Bill A00139

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/25
• Refer: 1/8/25
• Refer: 1/7/26

Caption

Prohibits the siting and construction of battery energy storage systems and related facilities, systems, infrastructure, and substations of any scale and possessing any storage capacity in assembly district 63; provides for the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof.

Summary

Bill A00139 seeks to amend the general municipal law to prohibit the siting and construction of battery energy storage systems and related infrastructure in assembly district 63. This legislation is driven by concerns regarding public health and safety, particularly the risks associated with air pollution and potential explosions from such facilities located near residential areas, schools, and businesses. The bill defines battery energy storage systems and categorizes them into tier one and tier two based on their energy capacity. It explicitly prohibits the issuance of permits for these systems in the specified assembly district, with exceptions for small-scale residential applications and industrial zones.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly alter the landscape for energy storage development in assembly district 63, effectively halting any new projects related to battery energy storage systems. This prohibition could impact local energy policies and the state's broader renewable energy goals, potentially leading to increased reliance on traditional energy sources in the area. The bill is set to expire on December 31, 2034, unless renewed, which may create uncertainty for future energy planning in the district.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A00139 appears to be mixed. While proponents emphasize the importance of protecting public health and safety, opponents may argue that the ban could hinder progress toward renewable energy initiatives and energy storage advancements. The bill was held for consideration in the Assembly Local Governments Committee with a vote of 13 in favor and 5 against, indicating some level of support but also notable opposition.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between public safety and the need for renewable energy development. Supporters of the bill, including local representatives, argue that the risks associated with battery energy storage systems outweigh the benefits, particularly in densely populated areas. Conversely, critics may contend that the prohibition could stifle innovation and investment in clean energy technologies, which are essential for achieving state and national energy goals.