New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A07518

Introduced
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Refer
1/7/26  

Caption

Provides for the election of judges to family court within the City of New York, rather than for the appointment of such judges.

Summary

Bill A07518 proposes an amendment to Article 6 of the New York State Constitution concerning the selection process for judges in Family Court within New York City. The bill seeks to change the current system of appointing Family Court judges by the mayor to an electoral process where judges would be elected by the residents of the counties that comprise the city. This amendment aims to enhance democratic participation in the judicial selection process and ensure that judges are accountable to the electorate.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly alter the judicial landscape in New York City by transitioning from an appointed to an elected system for Family Court judges. This change could lead to increased public engagement in judicial matters and may influence the types of candidates who run for these positions. Additionally, it could affect the overall functioning of the Family Court system, potentially leading to changes in how cases are handled and the priorities set by elected judges.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill A07518 appears to be mixed, with some legislators supporting the move towards an electoral system as a means to increase accountability and public trust in the judiciary. However, there are concerns about the implications of politicizing the judiciary and the potential impact on judicial independence. The lack of voting history and committee discussions makes it difficult to gauge the full extent of support or opposition.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from some lawmakers about the risks of politicizing the judiciary and the potential for election campaigns to influence judicial decision-making. Supporters argue that an elected judiciary would be more responsive to the community's needs, while opponents worry that it could undermine the impartiality of judges. The debate centers around the balance between accountability to the public and the independence of the judiciary.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NY S10331

Requires the advice and consent of the city council when the New York City mayor is appointing judges for family court and city-wide criminal courts.

NY S10139

Increases the number of family court judges in the city of New York to seventy-two; provides for two additional family court judges for each of Westchester and Rockland counties and an additional family court judge for each of Erie and Niagara counties.

NY S07467

Increases the number of family court judges in the city of New York to seventy-two; provides for two additional family court judges for each of Westchester and Rockland counties and an additional family court judge for each of Erie and Niagara counties.

MO SJR63

Provides for the election, rather than the selection, of certain circuit and associate circuit judges

MD HB975

Queen Anne's County - Circuit Court Judgeships

MD HB361

Queen Anne’s County – Circuit Court Judgeships

MD HB0361

Queen Anne’s County – Circuit Court Judgeships

MD SB877

Queen Anne's County - Circuit Court Judgeships

MD SB358

Queen Anne's County - Circuit Court Judgeships

NY A07221

Relates to the selection of judges to Family Court within the City of New York.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.