New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

New York Assembly Bill A03870

Introduced
1/30/25  
Refer
1/30/25  

Caption

Relates to the number of judges of the family court in St. Lawrence county; adds an additional judge at the same compensation rate.

Summary

This bill amends the Family Court Act to increase the number of Family Court judges in St. Lawrence County by one. It creates a new subdivision in section 131 specifying that St. Lawrence County shall have one additional Family Court judge, and that the new judge will receive the same compensation as the existing Family Court judge in the county. The measure is narrowly focused on judicial staffing in a single county and does not change the substantive jurisdiction or procedures of Family Court. Its practical effect would be to expand the local bench in St. Lawrence County, which could help distribute caseloads, reduce delays, and improve access to family court services for litigants, children, and families in the county.

Impact

The bill would amend section 131 of the Family Court Act to alter the authorized number of Family Court judges in St. Lawrence County from the current number to one additional judge. It would also require that the new position be compensated at the same rate as the existing Family Court judge in that county. Because the bill applies only to St. Lawrence County, its legal impact is limited to local judicial administration rather than statewide family law policy.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes, the measure appears administrative and noncontroversial on its face. The stated purpose suggests a practical response to local court needs, and there is no indication in the available materials of organized opposition or partisan disagreement. The overall sentiment is best characterized as neutral to supportive, with the bill framed as a staffing adjustment rather than a policy change.

Contention

No specific points of contention are reflected in the available transcripts or voting history, because none were provided. In general, bills adding judges can raise questions about cost, workload justification, and whether a county’s caseload warrants an additional judgeship, but those issues are not documented here. The only explicit policy choice in the bill is to create an additional judgeship at the same compensation level as the existing judge.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NY S10139

Increases the number of family court judges in the city of New York to seventy-two; provides for two additional family court judges for each of Westchester and Rockland counties and an additional family court judge for each of Erie and Niagara counties.

NY S07467

Increases the number of family court judges in the city of New York to seventy-two; provides for two additional family court judges for each of Westchester and Rockland counties and an additional family court judge for each of Erie and Niagara counties.

SC H3529

Family Court Judges, additional

SC H3521

Family Court Judges, additional

NY S02624

Adds three additional family court judges to the county of Richmond; adds three additional judges to the civil court of the county of Richmond.

NY A04393

Adds three additional family court judges to the county of Richmond; adds three additional judges to the civil court of the county of Richmond.

NY S10444

Relates to increasing the salaries of judges, justices, administrators of the courts and administrative judges in various courts.

MD HB864

St. Mary's County - Judgeships - Circuit Courts

MD SB620

St. Mary's County - Judgeships - Circuit Courts

SC H4711

Additional circuit court judges

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.