Relates to protecting potential tenants with a criminal history; relates to protecting public housing applicants with a criminal history.
Summary
Bill A01617 seeks to amend the executive law and the administrative code of New York City to protect potential tenants with a criminal history from discrimination in housing applications. It prohibits landlords from denying rental applications solely based on an applicant's criminal history. Additionally, the bill amends the public housing law to ensure that applicants for state or locally funded rental subsidies or affordable housing lotteries are not asked about their criminal history until they are deemed eligible. It establishes criteria for denying applications based on criminal history and allows for appeals of rejected applications.
Impact
If enacted, this bill would significantly alter the landscape of tenant screening in New York by preventing landlords and housing authorities from using criminal history as a blanket reason for denial of housing. This change aims to increase housing accessibility for individuals with criminal records and reduce barriers to housing that can perpetuate cycles of poverty and recidivism. The bill would require the development of regulations to guide the application process for rental subsidies and affordable housing lotteries, ensuring that only relevant criminal history is considered.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding Bill A01617 appears to be supportive among advocates for criminal justice reform and housing rights, who argue that the bill addresses systemic discrimination against individuals with criminal histories. However, there may be concerns from some landlord associations and property owners who fear that the bill could complicate tenant screening processes and potentially impact safety in housing communities.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the balance between protecting the rights of individuals with criminal histories and the concerns of landlords regarding tenant safety and property management. Advocates for the bill argue that it is essential to provide second chances, while opponents may express worries about the implications for community safety and the potential for increased risk in rental properties.
Further providing for definitions; prohibiting use of criminal history and retaliation relating to use of criminal history; providing for notice to prospective occupants and tenants relating to use of criminal history and for exclusions and other legal requirements relating to use of criminal history; and further providing for procedure and for civil penalties.