An act to amend Section 51 of the Civil Code, and to amend Sections 12920, 12921, 12926, 12940, and 12955 of the Government Code, relating to discrimination.
Impact
If enacted, AB 2064 would strengthen the legal framework surrounding employment and housing discrimination laws in California. By explicitly including criminal history and formerly incarcerated status as protected categories, the bill aims to reduce barriers that these individuals encounter when seeking employment or housing. This could lead to greater social equity and support reintegration efforts by individuals who have completed their sentences, potentially improving public safety and community stability.
Summary
Assembly Bill 2064, introduced by Assembly Member Sharp-Collins, proposes significant amendments to California's civil rights laws, specifically targeting discrimination based on criminal history and formerly incarcerated status. This expansion adds these characteristics to the already protected classes under the Unruh Civil Rights Act and California Fair Employment and Housing Act, which aim to ensure equal treatment in accommodations, employment, and housing opportunities. This broadening of protections seeks to combat systemic discrimination that individuals with criminal histories often face when reintegrating into society.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 2064 appears to be largely supportive among social justice advocates and civil rights organizations, who argue that this legislation is a necessary step in addressing the stigma faced by individuals with criminal backgrounds. They emphasize the importance of second chances and reducing recidivism rates. However, there may be concerns from certain segments of the public or lawmakers who worry about the implications for employers and landlords, fearing that this could complicate background checks and hiring practices.
Contention
Notable points of contention likely revolve around the balance between protecting the rights of formerly incarcerated individuals and the interests of employers and housing providers. Some opponents may argue that these protections could hinder businesses' abilities to make informed decisions during the hiring process, especially in fields where background checks are crucial for safety and compliance. Conversely, supporters of the bill will argue that this approach promotes fairness and recognizes the rehabilitation efforts of those who have paid their debt to society.
An act to add Section 37224 to, and to add Article 12 (commencing with Section 66095) to Chapter 2 of Part 40 of Division 5 of Title 3 of, the Education Code, and to amend Sections 11131 and 54961 of the Government Code, relating to holidays.