Establishes a claim for fraudulent inducement to enter into an employment relationship based on false promises as to wages, benefits, or intentions as to the duration of employment.
Summary
This bill would amend New York labor law to create a new civil cause of action for fraudulent inducement in employment. It prohibits an employer from knowingly making false or misleading statements about wages, benefits, or wage supplements in order to persuade a person to enter into or remain in an employment relationship. The bill is aimed at situations where a worker accepts or stays in a job based on deceptive promises about compensation or related terms.
If an employee is harmed by such misrepresentations, the bill allows the employee to sue for all reliance damages, plus costs, reasonable attorney’s fees, prejudgment interest, and liquidated damages equal to 100% of the reliance damages. The measure would take effect immediately upon enactment.
Impact
The bill would add a new section 198-f to the New York Labor Law, expanding employee remedies against employers that make deceptive statements during hiring or retention. It would give workers a statutory claim specifically tied to false promises about pay and benefits, and it would increase potential employer liability by authorizing attorney’s fees, interest, and doubled reliance damages. The practical effect would be to strengthen enforcement against wage-and-benefit misrepresentations in recruitment and employment retention.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record is available, so there is no documented debate or recorded support/opposition in the materials provided. Based on the bill text and caption, the measure appears to be framed as a worker-protection bill focused on honesty in hiring and compensation promises.
Contention
The main potential point of contention is the scope of employer liability for statements made during recruitment or while an employee is already working, especially where employers may argue that compensation plans, benefits, or job duration can change over time. Another likely issue is the bill’s strong damages structure, including attorney’s fees and liquidated damages equal to 100% of reliance damages, which could be viewed by employers as creating significant litigation exposure. No specific objections or supporters are identified in the provided record.
Providing for assumption of employment relationship, for terms of yearly employment contract, for prohibition on waivers or limitations of employment protections, for elements of wrongful discharge, for remedies for wrongful discharge and for probationary period of employment.
Modifies provisions of the employment security program and establishes the "Employment Security Program Integrity Act of 2025", relating to the administration of unemployment compensation
Restricts the use by an employer or an employment agency of electronic monitoring or an automated employment decision tool to screen a candidate or employee for an employment decision unless such tool has been the subject of an impact assessment within the last year; requires notice to employment candidates of the use of such tools; provides remedies for violations.