New Jersey 2026-2027 Regular Session

New Jersey Senate Bill S4303

Caption

Permits physician assistant or advanced practice nurse to verify excusal from jury service due to medical inability to serve.

Summary

S4303 amends New Jersey’s jury-excusal statute to expand who may verify a prospective juror’s medical inability to serve. Under current law, only a licensed physician may provide that verification; this bill adds physician assistants and advanced practice nurses, so long as they are licensed or certified under Title 45 of the Revised Statutes. The change is limited to the medical-hardship basis for excusal and does not alter the other existing grounds for being excused from jury service. The bill applies immediately and would govern prospective jurors summoned on or after the effective date. In practical terms, it is intended to make it easier for jurors with legitimate medical limitations to document their inability to serve, while reducing the need for a physician-specific certification in cases where another qualified health professional is already treating the person.

Impact

The bill would amend N.J.S.2B:20-10, New Jersey’s jury-service excusal statute, by broadening the category of health professionals authorized to verify a medical inability to serve. It would not change the substantive standard for excusal, but it would expand the pool of practitioners whose certification can satisfy that standard. The affected parties are prospective jurors seeking medical excusals, physician assistants, advanced practice nurses, and the courts that process jury-service hardship requests.

Sentiment

The available bill text and context suggest a generally practical, noncontroversial measure focused on administrative efficiency and access. No committee transcript or vote record is provided, and the statement frames the bill as a narrow technical update rather than a policy shift. The overall tone is supportive of easing the verification process for medically unable jurors.

Contention

The main point of potential contention is whether expanding verification authority beyond licensed physicians could weaken the rigor of medical excusal determinations. Supporters would likely view the change as reflecting modern health-care practice, where physician assistants and advanced practice nurses often provide primary care and can competently certify medical limitations. Any concern would likely come from those favoring stricter physician-only verification or seeking to preserve existing safeguards in jury administration, but no explicit opposition is shown in the provided materials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI SB0372

Housing: landlord and tenants; reuse of certain tenant screening reports; allow. Amends title & sec. 1 of 1972 PA 348 (MCL 554.601) & adds secs. 1e, 1f, 1g & 1h.

NJ A1580

Exempts judges and justices from jury duty.

NJ A1956

Clarifies excuse from jury service for members of the military or reserve under certain circumstances; repeals N.J.S.38A:4-6.

AZ HB2128

Environmental remediation; liability; release

MI HB4995

Housing: landlord and tenants; prohibition of the use of prospective tenants' credit scores as a sole deciding factor for lease eligibility and allowance for landlords to accept reusable screening reports; provide for. Amends title & sec. 1 of 1972 PA 348 (MCL 554.601) & adds secs. 1e, 1f, 1g & 1h.

WI SB1057

Access to prospective tenants’ credit scores and consumer credit reports.

WI AB1058

Access to prospective tenants’ credit scores and consumer credit reports.

UT HB0141

Adoption Modifications