Requiring the use of hand-marked, durable paper ballots in elections.
Impact
If enacted, HB 1064 will significantly alter the voting procedures in New Hampshire. Local municipalities that currently utilize electronic ballot-counting devices will need to adapt to a system dominated by manual counting. This transition may increase operational requirements on election day, necessitating more personnel and additional training. While proponents argue this will enhance transparency in elections, concerns arise regarding the efficiency and speed of results, as manual counting can be more time-consuming than electronic methods.
Summary
House Bill 1064 aims to enhance the integrity of elections in New Hampshire by mandating the use of hand-marked, durable paper ballots for all elections. The bill specifically prohibits the use of electronic devices, including scanners and computers, for counting and tallying votes. By requiring that all ballots be counted by hand, the bill advocates for a system designed to reduce the risk of malfunction or manipulation associated with electronic voting technology, reflecting a broader national conversation on election security.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 1064 appears to be divided. Supporters, primarily from GOP circles, argue that the bill reinforces voter confidence by ensuring that votes are counted in a secure and transparent manner. Detractors, however, highlight potential issues regarding the speed and accuracy of manually counted ballots and express concerns that the bill could lead to longer waits for election results, especially in tightly contested races.
Contention
Notable points of contention revolve around the feasibility of implementing hand-counted ballots across varying sizes of municipalities, particularly those with larger populations. Some legislators and electoral officials worry that such a change could overwhelm local systems and lead to logistical challenges. Additionally, the financial implications of increased labor costs for election day operations have drawn attention, suggesting that while there are long-term savings by removing reliance on machines, the immediate fiscal impacts remain complex and indeterminate.
Relating to the elimination of electronic poll lists and the countywide polling place program and to the required use of hand-marked paper ballots for all elections.
Requiring moderators to inspect absentee ballot affidavits for full execution including use of a notary, election officer, or any person authorized by law to administer oaths.
AN ACT relating to elections; providing for the hand counting of ballots; establishing statewide standards related to the handling and counting of ballots; providing for the reconciling of ballot numbers; prohibiting the use of voting machines for casting or tabulating ballots; providing duties for county clerks and the secretary of state; revising requirements for the post-election ballot audit; requiring rulemaking; revising offenses related to elections; providing penalties; making conforming amendments; repealing conflicting provisions; making legislative findings; specifying applicability; and providing for an effective date.