North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session

North Dakota Senate Bill SCR4028

Caption

A concurrent resolution to create and enact a new article to the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to term limits for the governor, lieutenant governor, statewide elected officials, and members of the legislative assembly and prior years of service for members of the legislative assembly and statewide elected officers; to repeal sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of article XV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to cumulative term limits for members of the legislative assembly and the office of governor, and legislative authority, and initiative petition processes; and to provide an effective date.

Summary

SCR4028 proposes a constitutional amendment to establish term limits for various state offices in North Dakota. Specifically, it restricts individuals from being elected more than twice to the offices of governor and lieutenant governor, and no more than three times for statewide elected officials such as the attorney general and auditor. Additionally, it limits members of the legislative assembly to four complete four-year terms. The bill also stipulates that any prior service before the 2022 general election will not count towards these new term limits and repeals conflicting provisions in the existing state constitution. The bill aims to promote political turnover and prevent long-term incumbency in state offices, thereby encouraging new candidates and ideas in governance. If approved, the changes would take effect on January 1, 2027, and would require voter approval during the general election in 2026. The measure seeks to enhance democratic processes by limiting the duration of service for elected officials, which proponents argue could lead to more responsive and accountable governance. However, the bill faced significant opposition and ultimately failed to pass. Critics raised concerns about the potential disruption to governance and the loss of experienced officials in key roles. They argued that term limits could hinder effective leadership and continuity in state administration, particularly in complex roles that require extensive knowledge and experience. The sentiment surrounding SCR4028 was mixed, with proponents advocating for the need for change and opponents cautioning against the unintended consequences of such limits. The discussions highlighted a divide between those who believe in the necessity of fresh leadership and those who value the experience of long-serving officials. As a result, the bill did not garner enough support to move forward, reflecting the challenges of implementing term limits in a state with a history of political stability.

Impact

If enacted, SCR4028 would significantly alter the political landscape in North Dakota by instituting term limits for key state offices. This would lead to a reduction in the number of long-serving officials, potentially increasing competition for these positions. The repeal of existing provisions related to cumulative term limits would also streamline the rules governing elections and the tenure of elected officials. The amendment would necessitate adjustments in campaign strategies for current and future candidates, as they would need to consider the implications of these limits on their political careers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SCR4028 was polarized, with strong advocacy from supporters who argued for the need for term limits to foster new leadership and ideas, while opponents expressed concerns about the loss of experienced officials and the potential negative impact on governance. The bill ultimately failed to pass, indicating a lack of consensus on the issue among lawmakers and the public.

Contention

Notable points of contention included the debate over the necessity and effectiveness of term limits. Supporters, including some legislators, argued that term limits would enhance democratic accountability and reduce the risk of entrenched political power. In contrast, opponents, including experienced politicians and some constituents, contended that term limits could disrupt governance and lead to a loss of institutional knowledge, ultimately harming the state's administration.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

ND SCR4028

Cumulative term limits for members of the legislative assembly and the office of governor, and legislative authority, and initiative petition processes; and to provide an effective date.

ND HCR3034

Prohibiting the legislative assembly from proposing certain amendments to article XV of the Constitution of North Dakota; and to provide for application.

ND SCR4008

Prohibiting the legislative assembly from proposing certain amendments to article XV of the Constitution of North Dakota, and to provide for an application.

ND HCR3036

Sessions of the legislative assembly; and to provide an effective date.

ND SCR4007

Requiring each resolution adopted by the legislative assembly proposing a constitutional amendment and each initiative petition and measure proposing a constitutional amendment to be comprised of a single subject.

ND HB1356

Access to requests to the legislative council made by members of the legislative assembly.

ND HB1323

Reimbursement of members of the legislative assembly; and to provide for retroactive application.

ND HB1300

Legislative term limits.

ND HB1495

Leaves of absence from employment for members of the legislative assembly.

ND SCR4003

A concurrent resolution to rescind all extant applications by the North Dakota Legislative Assembly to call a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution under Article V of the United States Constitution.

Similar Bills

HI SB2265

Proposing Amendments To The Hawaii State Constitution To Enable Legislation By The People.

HI SB2766

Proposing Amendments To Articles Ii, Iii, And Xvii Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Provide The Electorate With The Power Of Initiative.

DE SB15

An Act Concurring In A Proposed Amendment To Article Iii Of The Delaware Constitution Relating To Members Of The Governor's Cabinet.

NJ ACR12

Proposes constitutional amendment removing gubernatorial appointment of certain municipal court judges.

CA ACAX11

Stop Politicians from Violating Our Constitutional Rights Act of 2025.

AL HB471

Lieutenant Governor, vacancy in office, require the office be filled by election in certain circumstances

NJ SCR30

Proposes constitutional amendment to limit effective period of certain emergency orders, rules, or regulations issued by Governor to 14 days.

TX SJR40

Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the powers of the governor, the legislature, and the supreme court following certain disaster or emergency declarations.