Affirms the sovereignty of the people of the state of Missouri in areas protected by the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and creates the Joint Committee on the Review of Federal Overreach
Impact
SCR2 proposes the creation of a 'Joint Committee on the Review of Federal Overreach' tasked with identifying specific federal laws and regulations perceived to exceed constitutional boundaries. This committee will consist of members from both the Senate and the House of Representatives, reflecting a bipartisan approach to address concerns regarding federal jurisdiction. The outcome of this resolution could lead to significant discussions around the balance of power between state and federal governments, potentially impacting future legislative approaches to federal regulations within the state.
Summary
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 2 (SCR2) asserts the sovereignty of the people of Missouri, emphasizing the need for the federal government to operate within constitutionally-delegated powers as outlined in the Tenth Amendment. The resolution articulates the belief that any powers not explicitly granted to the federal government by the Constitution are retained by the states and the people. This resolution serves as a declaration that Missourians are not subject to unlimited federal control and that local governance should safeguard their rights against federal usurpation.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SCR2 appears to lean towards a protective stance for state rights and individual liberties. Proponents of the resolution praise it for affirming state sovereignty and pushing back against perceived federal overreach, suggesting a proactive step to reclaim local governance. Conversely, critics may view it as an unnecessary or contentious initiative that could complicate state-federal relations and reduce the effectiveness of federal laws meant to address broader national issues, thereby reflecting a polarized view on such matters.
Contention
Notable points of contention center around the interpretation of constitutional powers and the effectiveness of existing federal laws. Advocates argue for a strict adherence to constitutional limits on federal authority, while opponents may contend that such measures could weaken federal protections necessary for addressing issues that cross state lines or require national attention. The establishment of the Joint Committee and its findings could serve as a catalyst for future debates on the limits of federal powers, particularly as members work to navigate the complexities of existing laws and state needs.
A resolution to affirm the constitutional right of the people of Michigan to propose amendments to the Michigan Constitution and to approve or reject those amendments, including constitutional amendments that impact federal elections, such as Proposal 3 of 2018 and Proposal 2 of 2022.
States findings of the Legislature and calls on Congress to pass a constitutional amendment affirming the authority of states to govern their election processes.
A JOINT RESOLUTION relating to unconstitutional acts that would undermine the rights of Kentucky citizens and the sovereignty of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
A JOINT RESOLUTION relating to unconstitutional acts that would undermine the rights of Kentucky citizens and the sovereignty of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Affirming the natural right of persons and affirming that the state and federal government are established for the purpose of upholding, protecting, and securing these rights.
JOINT RESOLUTION RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING A CONVENTION OF THE STATES UNDER ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION (Petitions congress to call a convention for the purpose of proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution to impose restraints on the federal government.)