A JOINT RESOLUTION relating to unconstitutional acts that would undermine the rights of Kentucky citizens and the sovereignty of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Summary
SJR19 is a joint resolution asserting Kentucky’s sovereign authority to reject or “nullify” federal actions the General Assembly deems unconstitutional. The resolution frames federal overreach as a threat to Kentucky citizens’ rights and to the Commonwealth’s sovereignty, citing the Kentucky Constitution, the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers, the Bill of Rights, and historical writings associated with the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798. It also specifically rejects any perceived transfer of authority to international organizations and objects to federal or global actions involving digital passports, central bank digital currency, fees, taxes, or mandates.
The resolution directs the Kentucky Attorney General to challenge unconstitutional federal acts and to file or join amicus briefs with other state officials in support of state sovereignty. It also states that state nullification may be carried out through enactment of a bill of nullification by the General Assembly. As a joint resolution, it would express the legislature’s position and direct state officials, but it would not itself amend Kentucky’s statutes in the way a substantive bill would.
Impact
If adopted, SJR19 would not directly change Kentucky’s criminal, civil, or regulatory statutes, but it would establish an official legislative stance favoring state nullification of federal actions and could influence litigation strategy by directing the Attorney General to challenge federal measures. The resolution’s practical effect would be political and legal advocacy rather than immediate statutory change, though it could lay groundwork for future nullification legislation or state-federal conflicts over enforcement of federal rules, agency regulations, executive orders, or international agreements.
Sentiment
The bill text is strongly supportive of the resolution’s premise, using emphatic language about constitutional limits, state sovereignty, and the illegitimacy of federal overreach. No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no evidence in the supplied record of debate, amendments, or bipartisan support/opposition. Based on the text alone, the measure appears to be driven by a strong anti-federal-regulatory sentiment and a pro-states-rights posture.
Contention
The main points of contention are likely to be the resolution’s claim that Kentucky can nullify unconstitutional federal acts, its broad characterization of federal agencies and courts as overreaching, and its explicit rejection of authority associated with international organizations and digital currency/passport systems. Supporters would likely view these provisions as a defense of constitutional limits and state sovereignty, while critics would likely argue that the resolution misstates federal supremacy doctrine, invites conflict with federal law, and could encourage legally dubious nullification efforts. The directive to the Attorney General to challenge all unconstitutional federal acts may also be seen as broad and potentially open-ended.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.