Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF4647

Introduced
3/7/24  

Caption

Data practices provisions modified to modernize and update data storage practices.

Impact

By implementing these amendments, HF4647 significantly impacts the way government entities manage personal and confidential data. Notably, the bill requires that any breaches of security must be disclosed to affected individuals promptly. This provision aims to increase transparency and protect individual rights, allowing citizens to be informed about the potential misuse of their personal information. Furthermore, the bill establishes a framework for the potential legal recourse for individuals whose data is mishandled, thereby reinforcing governmental accountability.

Summary

House File 4647 introduces modifications to existing data practices within Minnesota, emphasizing the need to modernize data storage and security practices. This bill seeks to amend multiple statutes to ensure that all data regarding individuals is not only accurate and complete but also stored securely. The intent is to safeguard confidential data against unauthorized access and to delineate clear procedures for handling breaches, thus enhancing data protection for individuals.

Contention

There are potential areas of contention surrounding HF4647. Critics may argue that while the bill enhances data protection, it may also impose substantial administrative burdens on government agencies tasked with ensuring compliance. Concerns may arise over the implications of the new notification requirements and the possible liabilities for unauthorized access, especially regarding how these measures could strain resources or lead to conflicting interpretations of compliance. As stakeholders assess the bill, the balance between improved data protection and operational feasibility will be crucial.

Companion Bills

MN SF4949

Similar To Certain data practices modifications to modernize and update data storage practices

Previously Filed As

MN SF2885

Government Data Practices Act modification; Official Records Act modification

MN SF2089

Data practices modification

MN HB3200

Modifies provisions relating to the modernization of certain property assessment practices

MN HF4625

Data practices; terminology updated.

MN HF2739

Changes made to various sections of the Government Data Practices Act.

MN SF4945

Tax-related data practices policy and technical provisions

MN SF3710

Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board data practices modification

MN SF499

Data practices complaints filing fee reduction provision

MN SB1633

Modifies provisions relating to unlawful discriminatory practices

MN SB732

Modifies provisions relating to unlawful discriminatory practices

Similar Bills

CA AB2570

Elderly Parole Program.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.

TX HB1080

Relating to the publication of required notice by a political subdivision by alternative media.

CA SB680

Sex offender registration: unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.

CA AB387

An act to amend Section 219 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to juries.

CA SB689

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

US HB31

Cover Outstanding Vulnerable Expansion-eligible Residents Now Act or the COVER Now Act This bill establishes a demonstration program to allow local governments to provide health benefits to the Medicaid expansion population in states that have not expanded Medicaid. Under the program, local governments may provide coverage for individuals who are newly eligible for Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (i.e., the Medicaid expansion population) for a maximum of 10 years, or until their respective states expand Medicaid. The bill provides a 100% federal matching rate for the first three years of program participation. The bill prohibits states from taking certain actions against participating localities, such as withholding funding, increasing taxes, or restricting provider participation. States that violate these requirements are subject to certain funding penalties.