Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB295

Introduced
1/25/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Report Pass
3/6/23  
Engrossed
3/9/23  

Caption

Public Institutions of Higher Education - Student Withdrawal Policy - Reimbursement of Tuition and Fees (Cameron Carden Act of 2023)

Impact

The bill's enactment is expected to have significant implications for state laws related to higher education, specifically regarding how institutions handle student withdrawals. By establishing mandatory policies for reimbursement, the legislation addresses a gap in current practices which may lead to financial burdens on students who need to leave their studies for valid reasons. This move is likely intended to promote student wellbeing and ensure that financial setbacks do not deter individuals from pursuing their education due to unforeseen hardships.

Summary

House Bill 295, known as the Cameron Carden Act of 2023, seeks to reform the withdrawal policies of public institutions of higher education within the University System of Maryland. The bill mandates that all constituent institutions develop a policy allowing students to withdraw under specified extenuating circumstances, which include illness, injury, hospitalization, and mental health issues. Upon withdrawal due to these circumstances, the institutions are required to reimburse students for tuition and fees paid for that semester.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB295 appears to be positive, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for supportive measures that prioritize student health and wellness. Advocates argue that the bill provides necessary protections for students in vulnerable situations, allowing for a more equitable educational experience. Conversely, there may be concerns about the potential financial ramifications for universities, especially regarding how institutions will fund these reimbursements.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may arise from discussions about how effectively institutions can implement the mandated policies without compromising their financial stability or administrative efficiency. Additionally, debates could surface regarding the definition of 'extenuating circumstances' and whether it adequately covers the diverse needs of students. As institutions navigate these new requirements, it will be critical to consider the balance between supporting student needs and maintaining operational viability.

Companion Bills

MD HB872

Carry Over Public Institutions of Higher Education - Student Withdrawal Policy - Reimbursement of Tuition and Fees (The Cameron Carden Act of 2022)

Previously Filed As

MD HB436

Higher educational institutions, public; tuition and mandatory fees charged to Virginia students.

MD S4072

Requires public institution of higher education to adopt withdrawal policy permitting refund for certain extenuating circumstances.

MD A1319

Requires public institution of higher education to adopt withdrawal policy permitting refund for certain extenuating circumstances.

MD S3383

Requires tuition aid grant amounts to be equal for students enrolled in independent institutions of higher education and students enrolled in four-year public institutions of higher education.

MD SB1835

Relating to the maximum number of nonresident scholarship students permitted to pay resident tuition and fees at certain public institutions of higher education.

MD HB4111

HIGHER ED-STUDENT WITHDRAWAL

MD HB6

Public Institutions of Higher Education - Pregnant and Parenting Students - Plan and Reporting

MD SB420

Public Institutions of Higher Education - Pregnant and Parenting Students - Plan and Reporting

MD HB0006

Public Institutions of Higher Education - Pregnant and Parenting Students - Plan and Reporting

MD HB5646

Relating to admission of and resident tuition rates and fees at public institutions of higher education for certain students in military-related programs.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.