Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB179

Introduced
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Refer
5/4/22  

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Removes the line item veto power of the governor

Impact

Should HB 179 pass, it would fundamentally alter the balance of power regarding budgetary decisions in Louisiana. The removal of the line item veto could lead to a more streamlined legislative process for appropriations, potentially allowing for faster budget approvals without the governor's ability to reject specific spending items. Advocates for the bill argue that eliminating this power would encourage a collaborative approach to governance and budgeting, fostering a more democratic process where elected representatives have greater control over financial allocations.

Summary

House Bill 179 proposes a significant constitutional amendment aimed at removing the governor's authority to veto specific line items in appropriation bills within the state of Louisiana. The current constitution allows the governor to exercise this veto power, which can nullify individual budget allocations unless overridden by the legislature. This proposed amendment seeks to repeal Article IV, Section 5(G) of the Louisiana Constitution, thus relinquishing this power from the state’s executive branch altogether. The measure is set to be submitted to voters for approval during the statewide election proposed for October 14, 2023.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 179 appears to be mixed, with proponents viewing it as an important step towards democratizing budgetary decisions, while opponents may see it as an overreach that could diminish the checks and balances inherent in the state's governance. Advocates emphasize that it would reduce executive overreach and empower the legislature, whereas critics might argue that the veto serves as a necessary tool to prevent excessive or inappropriate state spending. The discussion reflects ongoing tension between legislative authority and executive power in the state’s political dynamics.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential implications for fiscal accountability and the role of the governor in the budget process. Opponents of the bill could argue that the line item veto provides an essential mechanism for ensuring that appropriations align with state priorities and prevent wasteful spending. The debate is expected to highlight the implications of this constitutional change on future budgeting practices, and whether it safeguards or undermines responsible governance in Louisiana.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA SJR44

Proposing a constitutional amendment to remove the governor's line-item veto authority.

LA H5734

JOINT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND PUBLISH AND SUBMIT TO THE ELECTORS A PROPOSITION OF AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE -- LINE ITEM VETO (This proposed amendment to our state Constitution grants the governor a line-item veto on the budget and other appropriation bills.)

LA S0308

JOINT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND PUBLISH AND SUBMIT TO THE ELECTORS A PROPOSITION OF AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE -- REFERENDUM ON LINE ITEM VETO (This proposed amendment to the Constitution would provide the governor with a line item veto on the budget and other bills for the appropriation of money.)

LA S2317

JOINT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND PUBLISH AND SUBMIT TO THE ELECTORS A PROPOSITION OF AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE -- REFERENDUM ON LINE ITEM VETO (Proposed amendment to the Constitution provides the governor with a line item veto on the budget and other bills for the appropriation of money.)

LA H7387

JOINT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND PUBLISH AND SUBMIT TO THE ELECTORS A PROPOSITION OF AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE -- LINE ITEM VETO (This proposed amendment to our state Constitution grants the governor a line-item veto on the budget and other appropriation bills.)

LA SB2

Changes election dates for the spring 2026 statewide election for submission of proposed constitutional amendments. (Item #1) (gov sig) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

LA HB13

(Constitutional Amendment) Increases the number of associate supreme court justices (Items #3 and #4) (OR +$1,145,641 GF EX See Note)

LA SB123

Constitutional amendment to require the governor to certify a legislative address removing certain judges for cause. (2/3 - CA13s1(A)) (EG2 INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA HB18

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the statewide election of supreme court justices (Item #4)

LA SB6

Constitutional Amendment to increase the composition of the Louisiana Supreme Court. (Items #4, 5, and 13)(2/3 - CA13s1(A)) (EG +$1,145,641 GF EX See Note)

Similar Bills

LA HB472

(Constitutional Amendment) Revises Article VII of the Constitution of La. (OR -$139,000,000 GF RV See Note)

NJ ACR123

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR75

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR43

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

LA HB244

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB678

(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB473

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.