Claims state sovereignty for La. under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and demands that the federal government cease promulgating unconstitutional mandates
Impact
The enactment of HCR24 would reinforce the interpretation of state powers under the U.S. Constitution, particularly the limitations on federal authority. This resolution could impact the relationship between state and federal governments, potentially leading to conflicts over jurisdiction and policy enforcement. By asserting state sovereignty, Louisiana may seek to protect itself from what it deems unconstitutional federal mandates, thereby potentially energizing similar movements in other states and influencing national debates over the balance of power.
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution No. 24 (HCR24) asserts Louisiana's state sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, demanding that the federal government cease promulgating mandates that exceed its constitutional authority. The resolution emphasizes the belief that many federal actions violate the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not granted to the federal government for the states or the people. HCR24 serves as a formal statement from the Louisiana Legislature that affirms the state's position against overreach by the federal government.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HCR24 appears to be largely supportive among certain factions within Louisiana's political landscape, particularly among those who value states' rights and wish to limit federal government powers. However, it may raise concerns and opposition from those who worry about the implications of such a stance on federally mandated programs and protections. The resolution reflects a broader trend of tension between state and federal entities, particularly among states asserting their rights in response to perceived federal overreach.
Contention
Among the notable points of contention is the assertion that federal mandates are unconstitutional. Critics may argue that certain federal programs are essential for the welfare of the public and that states should not reject them purely on claims of sovereignty. Additionally, there is concern that such resolutions could lead to a fragmentation of policy across states and challenges related to enforcement of federal laws, complicating issues of governance and public policy.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)