HB2975 amends the Illinois School Code to require school boards to prohibit students from using cellular telephones in school or on school property while the student is attending class. The bill creates new provisions for both regular school districts and Chicago school districts, and it applies to all students subject to those districts’ rules. The prohibition is limited to classroom time and does not apply during lunch, recess, passing periods, or emergency situations.
The bill also repeals existing School Code provisions that currently allow school boards to set their own rules and disciplinary procedures for student use or possession of cellular radio telecommunication devices. In effect, HB2975 replaces local discretion with a statewide mandate on student cell phone use during class time. The bill is flagged as potentially implicating the State Mandates Act, suggesting that reimbursement to school districts may be required if the mandate creates additional costs.
Impact
HB2975 would change state law by adding new School Code sections and repealing current provisions that give school boards discretion over student cell phone policies. It would standardize classroom cell phone restrictions across Illinois public schools, including Chicago schools, and reduce local authority to adopt different rules or disciplinary approaches. Affected parties include school boards, administrators, students, and potentially districts that would need to update student conduct policies and enforcement practices.
Sentiment
The available context shows no committee transcript or recorded votes, so there is no documented debate or formal sentiment history in the provided materials. Based on the bill text and caption, the measure appears to be a straightforward school discipline and classroom management proposal aimed at limiting distractions. The absence of opposition or support in the record means sentiment cannot be measured from votes, but the bill’s structure suggests a policy preference for uniform restrictions rather than local variation.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely the bill’s removal of local school board discretion. Under current law, boards can set their own rules and disciplinary procedures for cell phone use, while HB2975 would impose a mandatory statewide prohibition during class. Another likely issue is enforcement and implementation costs, which is why the bill notes the State Mandates Act may require reimbursement. Supporters would likely emphasize classroom focus and reduced distraction, while opponents may raise concerns about flexibility, student safety, and district-level policy control.
Enacts the "cellular mapping act"; requires the public service commission to review cellular services within the state; requires the expansion of cellular services.
Enacts the "cellular mapping act"; requires the public service commission to review cellular services within the state; requires the expansion of cellular services.