Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

Iowa House Bill HSB71

Introduced
1/23/25  

Caption

A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions.(See HF 952.)

Summary

HSB71 would regulate the terms that may appear in contracts entered into by Iowa state agencies, including the Department of Administrative Services, the Department of Management, supported entities under the state IT contracting chapter, and other state agencies. It declares a long list of contract provisions void as against public policy if included in a state agency contract, and provides that such contracts are to be interpreted as if those provisions were never included. The prohibited terms focus on protecting the state from unfavorable or nonstandard vendor conditions. Examples include clauses requiring the state to indemnify or hold harmless a vendor, accept unilateral vendor changes, submit to binding arbitration, waive jury trial rights, pay attorney fees or taxes, accept foreign governing law, allow non-Polk County venue, or treat pricing and contract terms as confidential. The bill also bars certain software auto-renewal notice requirements, insurance mandates, shortened limitation periods, and vendor boilerplate that attempts to alter contract terms through ordering documents or quotations. HSB71 also adds two terms that must be read into every state agency vendor contract: Iowa law governs the contract, and any litigation must be brought in Polk County district court or the federal court in Des Moines, as appropriate. The bill applies prospectively to contracts entered into or renewed on or after its effective date. The bill’s impact on state law is to standardize and limit the bargaining positions available to vendors contracting with the state, while reinforcing constitutional and statutory limits on state liability, litigation forum, and contract administration. It would likely reduce the ability of vendors to impose private-form contract terms on public entities and would make Iowa’s preferred legal venue and governing law mandatory in state procurement agreements. The general sentiment reflected in the committee vote appears moderately favorable, with the House Committee on State Government reporting the bill 15-6. No committee transcript was provided, so the available record suggests support for the bill’s goal of protecting state agencies in procurement, though the split vote indicates some concern about the breadth of the restrictions or the degree of state control over contract negotiations. Notable points of contention likely include the limits on vendor confidentiality, arbitration, insurance, and dispute-resolution terms, as well as the bill’s automatic insertion of Iowa-law and Polk County venue provisions.

Impact

The bill would create new Code sections 8A.311C and 8A.311D governing state purchasing contracts. It would void specified contract clauses in agreements with state agencies and require that Iowa law and Polk County/Des Moines venue apply to all state agency vendor contracts. The measure would affect procurement practices across state government, especially information technology and other vendor contracts, by limiting enforceable vendor-drafted terms and preserving state control over litigation, liability, and contract administration.

Sentiment

The only recorded vote shows the House Committee on State Government advancing the bill 15-6, indicating overall support but not unanimity. With no transcript available, the sentiment can be characterized as generally favorable to protecting state agencies from unfavorable contract terms, while still drawing enough opposition to suggest concerns about the bill’s breadth and its impact on vendor negotiations.

Contention

The main points of contention are likely the bill’s broad prohibition on vendor-favorable clauses and its mandatory Iowa-law/Polk County venue rules. Opponents may object to voiding confidentiality provisions, arbitration clauses, insurance requirements, and vendor boilerplate, or to the state’s refusal to accept certain commercial terms that are common in private contracting. Supporters likely view these restrictions as necessary to prevent unconstitutional liability, preserve the attorney general’s role, and keep state contracts under Iowa law and Iowa courts.

Companion Bills

IA SF 297

Replaced by A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions. (Formerly SSB 1090.)

IA SSB1090

Related A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions.(See SF 297.)

IA HF 952

Replaced by A bill for an act relating to state grounds and contracts, including by providing for required and prohibited contract terms and regulating events on the capitol complex, and including applicability provisions.(Formerly HSB 71.)

Previously Filed As

IA HSB583

A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions.(See HF 2500.)

IA SSB1090

A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions.(See SF 297.)

IA SSB3030

A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions.(See SF 2206.)

IA SF297

A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions. (Formerly SSB 1090.)

IA SF2206

A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions.(Formerly SSB 3030.)

IA HF2500

A bill for an act relating to contracts entered into by state agencies and including applicability provisions. (Formerly HSB 583.) Effective date: 07/01/2026. Applicability date: 07/01/2026.

IA HF952

A bill for an act relating to state grounds and contracts, including by providing for required and prohibited contract terms and regulating events on the capitol complex, and including applicability provisions.(Formerly HSB 71.)

IA HF210

A bill for an act regulating litigation financing contracts, and including effective date and applicability provisions.

IA SSB1122

A bill for an act regulating litigation financing contracts, and including effective date and applicability provisions.

IA A07616

Relates to provisions governing contracting between state agencies and not-for-profit organizations including new, renewal, and extension contracts and advance payments and interest for such contracts; repeals provisions relating to interest payments.

Similar Bills

CA AB1931

Insurance: home protection companies.

CA AB2187

Public contracts: contracts for services.

AZ HB2895

Task order contracts; website; posting

AZ HB2445

task order contracts; website; posting

CA AB1809

Public contracts: school and community college districts.

CA SB272

San Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA AB483

Fixed term installment contracts: early termination fees.

NJ S3306

Requires notification to members of health club if club is to be sold and health club services contract assigned to new owner.