Georgia House Bill HR1617

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/26
• Enrolled: 3/6/26
• Passed: 3/6/26

Caption

Johnson-Moore, Dr. Karen; Elder Howard E. Moore; recipients of the 44th Presidential Legacy Lifetime Achievement Award presented by Trinity Girls Network Corp. and Trinity International University of Ambassadors; commend

Summary

House Resolution 1617 is a commemorative resolution honoring Dr. Karen Johnson-Moore and Elder Howard E. Moore for receiving the 44th Presidential Legacy Lifetime Achievement Award from Trinity Girls Network Corp. and Trinity International University of Ambassadors. The resolution recites their backgrounds and accomplishments, emphasizing their work in ministry, leadership, entrepreneurship, mentorship, marriage enrichment, women’s fellowship, and community service. The measure does not create a new program, impose a duty, or change regulatory policy. Instead, it is a formal expression of recognition by the House of Representatives and directs the Clerk to provide an official copy of the resolution to the honorees. Its practical effect is limited to ceremonial acknowledgment and public commendation, with no direct impact on state statutes or agency operations.

Impact

HR 1617 has no substantive effect on Georgia law, state agencies, or regulated parties. It is a nonbinding honorary resolution that only recognizes two individuals and authorizes distribution of the resolution, leaving existing statutes and legal obligations unchanged.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment is strongly positive and celebratory. The resolution frames the honorees as exemplary figures in faith-based leadership, community uplift, and humanitarian service, and there is no recorded opposition, committee debate, or vote history indicating controversy. The tone is appreciative and congratulatory throughout.

Contention

There is no apparent policy contention in the text or available legislative history. Because the resolution is purely honorary, it does not raise fiscal, legal, or regulatory disputes. Any differences in perspective would likely be limited to the broader practice of issuing ceremonial resolutions rather than to the honorees or their award.