House Resolution 156 is a congratulatory and commendatory resolution honoring Anna Borsh for receiving the 2024 Inclusion Award at Georgia Tech’s K-12 InVenture Prize State and National Finals, held in connection with the Raytheon Technologies Invention Convention United States Nationals. The resolution highlights that Ms. Borsh, a student from Panter Elementary School, helped create an app called “Grocery Eyes” with Nellie Klodner. The app is described as a tool designed to help visually impaired users navigate grocery stores more independently by using navigation, microphone, and camera features to locate items.
The resolution also notes that “Grocery Eyes” previously won the same award at the state level, where the students received Amazon tablets, and that the national award included a trophy, certificate, and $1,000 prize. The measure is purely ceremonial and does not create or amend any substantive law; instead, it formally recognizes a student achievement and directs the House Clerk to distribute a copy of the resolution to Anna Borsh.
Impact
HR 156 has no direct legal or regulatory impact on Georgia statutes, agencies, or public programs. It is a nonbinding honorary resolution that serves to recognize an individual student’s accomplishment and to place the commendation in the official record of the House of Representatives. No rights, duties, funding obligations, or statutory changes are created for any person or entity.
Sentiment
The sentiment around the resolution is strongly positive and celebratory. The bill text praises Anna Borsh’s creativity, diligence, and maturity, and the available context shows no recorded opposition, committee controversy, or negative votes. Because there are no transcripts or vote records, the measure appears to have been treated as an uncontroversial recognition resolution.
Contention
There is no notable contention reflected in the bill text, voting history, or committee materials provided. The resolution is focused entirely on honoring a student award winner and her assistive-technology project, and no lawmakers or stakeholders are identified as opposing it. Any discussion would likely center on the merits of the student’s achievement and the accessibility benefits of the app rather than on policy disagreement.