California Assembly Bill AB288

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/25
• Refer: 2/10/25
• Report Pass: 3/24/25
• Refer: 3/25/25
• Report Pass: 4/2/25
• Refer: 4/2/25
• Report Pass: 4/21/25
• Refer: 4/22/25
• Report Pass: 4/24/25
• Refer: 4/24/25
• Refer: 5/7/25
• Report Pass: 5/23/25
• Engrossed: 6/2/25
• Refer: 6/3/25
• Refer: 6/11/25
• Report Pass: 6/18/25
• Refer: 6/19/25
• Report Pass: 7/9/25
• Refer: 7/9/25
• Refer: 8/18/25
• Report Pass: 8/29/25
• Enrolled: 9/10/25
• Chaptered: 9/30/25
• Passed: 9/30/25

Caption

An act to amend Sections 1141 and 1148 of, and to add Sections 923.1 and 1140.6 to, the Labor Code, relating to employment.

Impact

This legislation is poised to significantly influence California's labor laws by bolstering the efficacy of worker representation in collective bargaining contexts. By allowing workers to petition PERB for the enforcement of their rights when federal protections falter, the bill potentially fills gaps that could arise from federal inaction. Additionally, the assurance of confidentiality for evidence gathered during grievance processes enhances protections for workers while they seek justice for unfair treatment. The establishment of a Public Employment Relations Board Enforcement Fund ensures resources for speedy addressal of violations, fostering a more robust labor rights environment.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 288, introduced by McKinnor, aims to amend sections of the Labor Code to strengthen labor organization rights and address unfair practices related to employment. The bill emphasizes the necessity for workers to exercise full freedom of association and collective bargaining free from employer coercion. It grants the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) expanded jurisdiction to protect and enforce workers' rights, particularly for those employed in positions that fall under the National Labor Relations Act but may have lost coverage due to regulatory changes. Updates to PERB's procedures and timelines for addressing unfair labor practice cases are also stipulated, alongside the establishment of a dedicated enforcement fund funded by civil penalties collected from violations of this bill.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 288 appears to be highly supportive among labor advocates and worker rights organizations, viewing it as a much-needed boost to collective bargaining rights. Advocates argue that it empowers workers amid rising employer resistance to unionization and bargaining. However, concerns from employer groups and some lawmakers reflect apprehensions about the potential for increased regulations and costs associated with compliance. The bill has spurred a debate balancing the need for strong worker protections against the interests of business flexibility and oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise around the expansion of PERB's jurisdiction, with critics arguing that this could lead to delays in processing claims and an overwhelming caseload for the agency. Opponents express concerns that the proposals may inadvertently undermine the National Labor Relations Board's authority, suggesting that overlapping jurisdictions could complicate labor relations. Meanwhile, supporters assert that any inefficiencies currently experienced under the NLRA highlight the urgency for California to assert its regulatory authority to protect workers effectively.