California Assembly Bill AB592

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/12/25
• Refer: 3/3/25
• Report Pass: 3/3/25
• Refer: 3/4/25
• Report Pass: 4/7/25
• Refer: 4/9/25
• Report Pass: 4/23/25
• Refer: 4/23/25
• Report Pass: 4/30/25
• Engrossed: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/28/25
• Report Pass: 6/17/25
• Refer: 6/17/25
• Report Pass: 6/24/25
• Refer: 6/25/25
• Report Pass: 7/21/25
• Refer: 7/21/25
• Enrolled: 9/8/25
• Chaptered: 10/9/25
• Passed: 10/9/25

Caption

An act to amend and repeal Section 25750.5 of the Business and Professions Code, to amend Section 65907 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 114067 and 114266 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to business.

Impact

The implications of AB 592 are significant for state laws governing the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages and food services. By extending the duration of COVID-19 Temporary Catering Authorizations, the bill provides much-needed relief to businesses coping with post-pandemic recovery. The measure allows for expanded outdoor dining without the immediate restrictions tied to the pandemic, potentially fostering economic recovery in the restaurant and hospitality sectors. However, the bill also introduces a state mandate that local agencies must comply with, thereby placing additional regulatory responsibilities on local governments.

Summary

Assembly Bill 592, introduced by Assemblymember Gabriel, focuses on the regulation of alcoholic beverages and retail food services in the context of changes necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill aims to extend certain provisions related to the temporary catering authorizations that were put in place during the state of emergency. Specifically, it would allow existing authorizations to remain effective until January 1, 2029, rather than expiring in 2026, thus providing continued flexibility for businesses that expanded their service areas during the pandemic. Additionally, new temporary catering authorizations would be prohibited from being issued after January 1, 2027, streamlining the operational framework for businesses moving forward.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 592 appears to be generally supportive among the business community, as it offers a lifeline to struggling establishments that had adapted their operations in response to health mandates. However, there are concerns from certain local government officials regarding the increased workload and financial burdens that might arise from the ongoing regulation and enforcement of these extended provisions. Advocates for public health and safety are also weighing in on the potential risks associated with loosening certain safety and zoning restrictions indefinitely.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the balance between business interests and public health considerations, particularly with the introduction of integrated pest management plans that restaurants will need to document and follow. While the bill seeks to facilitate easier operations for food establishments, the requirement to self-close upon vermin activity introduces serious operational challenges that could impact public health. Additionally, the prohibition on issuing new catering authorizations after a specified date raises questions about how businesses will adapt in a post-COVID context, highlighting ongoing debates over regulatory control and local government authority in enforcing safety standards.