California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1798

Introduced
2/10/26  
Refer
3/16/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  
Refer
4/9/26  
Report Pass
4/15/26  
Refer
4/20/26  
Report Pass
4/22/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Refer
5/6/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/27/26  

Caption

An act to amend Sections 791.06, 791.07, 791.11, 791.12, 10146, 10147, 10148, 10149, and 10149.1 of the Insurance Code, relating to insurance.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1798 would significantly alter how insurers handle genetic testing results. The bill repeals existing provisions that allow insurers to base underwriting decisions on genetic information, thereby strengthening protections against potential discrimination. The bill aims to create clearer boundaries around the information that can be used in insurance applications, making it illegal for insurers to require genetic testing as part of the underwriting process. It introduces civil penalties for violations of these rules, thereby holding insurers accountable for improper use of genetic data. This change is expected to encourage a more equitable insurance market for consumers.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1798 aims to enhance consumer protections regarding the use of genetic information in the life and disability insurance sectors. The bill seeks to prohibit insurance providers from canceling, limiting, or denying coverage based on the results of genetic testing unless certain criteria are satisfied. Additionally, it intends to prevent insurers from soliciting genetic information unless necessary under stringent conditions, such as for high-value policies above $1.5 million. This legislation represents a robust step towards safeguarding consumer privacy and autonomy in genetic matters, ensuring that individuals are not discriminated against due to their genetic predispositions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1798 appears to be largely supportive among consumer rights advocates, who view the legislation as crucial in today's data-sensitive environment. Advocates argue that the bill is necessary to prevent potential misuse of sensitive genetic information which may lead to unfair prejudice. Conversely, some industry representatives express concern that the restrictive nature of the bill may hinder their ability to appropriately assess risk and could lead to higher premiums for consumers due to increased uncertainty in underwriting.

Contention

One area of contention relates to the balance between consumer protection and the operational needs of insurance companies. Industry advocates suggest that preventing access to genetic testing could complicate their risk assessment processes, leading to less competitive insurance options. Moreover, there are concerns regarding the complexity of implementing these new regulations effectively. As the insurance landscape often necessitates quick adjustments, there is anxiety that such constraints might lead to unintended consequences, including increased overall insurance costs for consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB669

An act to add Sections 1367.

CA SB1258

Hazardous waste: site remediation: residential suitability guidelines.

CA AB951

An act to amend Section 1374.

CA AB2233

An act to amend Section 1374.73 of the Health and Safety Code, and to amend Section 10144.51 of the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.

CA SB1280

Health care coverage for mental health and substance use disorders.

CA AB2011

An act to add Section 1374.77 to the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10144.43 to the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.

CA AB1041

Health care coverage: health care provider credentials.

CA SB402

Health care coverage: autism.

CA SB812

An act to amend Section 1374.

CA AB723

Real estate: digitally altered images: disclosure.

Similar Bills

WI AB489

Voluntary prohibitions on purchasing a handgun and making an appropriation. (FE)

WI SB469

Voluntary prohibitions on purchasing a handgun and making an appropriation. (FE)

TX HB1809

Relating to prohibited insurance discrimination on the basis of an insured's marital status following the death of the insured's spouse.

TX HB1280

Relating to prohibiting governmental discriminatory practices as well as submissions and trainings that could lead to discriminatory treatment of individuals because of personal identity characteristics including an individual's race, color, ethnicity, sex, national origin or religion and the establishment of remedies and penalties for discriminatory treatment.

ND SB2392

The regulation of prohibited discriminatory practices; and to provide for a legislative management report.

ND SB2392

A BILL for an Act to create and enact a new chapter to title 15, a new chapter to title 15.1, a new section to chapter 54-10, and a new chapter to title 54 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the regulation of prohibited discriminatory practices; and to provide for a legislative management report.

AZ HCR2042

Preferential treatment; discrimination; prohibited acts

AZ HCR2044

Preferential treatment; discrimination; prohibited acts