Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB489

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/9/25
• Refer: 10/9/25
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

An Act to amend 175.35 (1) (at) and 175.35 (2g) (c) 4. a. and b.; to create 20.455 (2) (cw) and 165.64 of the statutes; Relating to: voluntary prohibitions on purchasing a handgun and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

The implementation of AB489 aims to enhance firearm safety by creating a mechanism for individuals who may feel unfit to own a handgun to legally restrict themselves from such purchases. The bill requires that the DOJ verify requests for voluntary prohibition, which adds a layer of accountability and security to the process. Moreover, during a background check initiated by a licensed firearms dealer, the bill mandates that the DOJ discloses any restrictions on an individual’s ability to purchase a handgun based on their inclusion in the self-exclusion database.

Summary

Assembly Bill 489 introduces provisions that allow individuals to voluntarily prohibit themselves from purchasing a handgun. This initiative entails the establishment of a database by the Department of Justice (DOJ), which will maintain records of individuals who opt for this self-exclusion. Those wishing to be included in the database must submit a request that specifies a desired period of prohibition, which can be one year (irrevocable), five years (irrevocable for the first year), or twenty years (irrevocable for the first year). The bill also stipulates a process for individuals to request the removal of their names from this database during revocable periods.

Contention

Although AB489 has been designed to promote self-regulation among individuals regarding handgun ownership, it raises pertinent discussions among legislators and constituents alike. Critics may argue about the implications of creating such a database regarding privacy and potential misuse of data, while proponents highlight its potential to reduce gun violence and prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands. The balance between individual rights and community safety remains a central theme in the ongoing dialogue surrounding this legislation.