Recognizing dedicated public service of Honorable Michael Andrew Woelfel
Summary
Senate Resolution 67 is a ceremonial resolution honoring the public service career of the Honorable Michael Andrew Woelfel. The resolution recites his background, including his education at Marshall University and the West Virginia University College of Law, his early work as an assistant prosecuting attorney and juvenile court referee, and his more than three decades as an adjunct professor at Marshall University. It also notes his election to the West Virginia Senate in 2014, his service on numerous standing committees, and his leadership roles as Minority Whip and Minority Leader.
The resolution further states that Senator Woelfel has chosen not to seek reelection in 2026 and formally expresses the Senate’s appreciation for his service to the state. It directs the Clerk to send him a copy of the resolution. As a simple resolution of recognition, it does not create, amend, or repeal any state law or statute; its effect is purely commemorative and administrative within the Senate.
Impact
SR67 has no substantive legal impact on West Virginia statutes, regulations, or agency authority. It is a nonbinding Senate resolution that serves to formally commend an individual legislator and record the chamber’s appreciation in the legislative journal. The only practical effect is ceremonial: it recognizes Michael Andrew Woelfel’s public service and directs that he receive an official copy of the resolution.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SR67 is strongly positive and respectful. The resolution was adopted unanimously by a 32-0 vote, indicating broad bipartisan support and no recorded opposition. The language of the measure is laudatory throughout, emphasizing dedication, leadership, and long service to the state.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention associated with SR67 because it is a recognition resolution rather than a substantive bill. The only potentially sensitive point is the reference to Senator Woelfel’s decision not to seek reelection, but that fact is presented as part of the resolution’s background and not as a matter of dispute. No committee debate or dissenting votes are recorded in the available materials.