Senate Bill 673 creates a new excise tax framework for electronic cigarette products in West Virginia and repeals the existing e-cigarette liquid tax provision. The bill imposes a nicotine-based tax of three cents per milligram of nicotine on all electronic cigarette products, with the stated goal of making the tax roughly equivalent to the state’s $1.20-per-pack cigarette excise tax. It defines key product categories such as open-system and closed-system devices, nicotine concentration, and total nicotine content, and it includes fallback assumptions for nicotine content when labeling is missing or unreliable.
The bill also dedicates all net revenue from the tax to a special revenue fund for the Public Employees Insurance Agency (PEIA). Those funds must be used to reduce or hold down the employee share of health insurance premiums while preserving the employer contribution percentage required by existing law. The bill expressly prohibits using the new revenue to replace employer premium contributions and requires PEIA to report annually on revenue collections and how the money affected employee premium rates. The effective date is July 1, 2026.
Impact
SB673 would amend West Virginia’s tobacco tax laws by replacing the prior e-cigarette liquid tax provision with a nicotine-content-based excise tax under a new article in the code. It would affect distributors and wholesalers of vaping products by making them responsible for paying the tax, and it would create presumptive nicotine-content rules for products that are not properly labeled. The bill would also direct the resulting revenue into PEIA, changing how state tax receipts are allocated and tying the tax to employee health insurance premium stabilization rather than the general fund.
Sentiment
The available context shows no recorded committee debate or votes, so there is no documented opposition or support from floor or committee action. Based on the bill text and caption, the measure appears framed as a public finance and health insurance stabilization bill, with a policy rationale of aligning vape taxation with cigarette taxation and using the proceeds to ease PEIA premium pressure. The overall tone of the bill is regulatory and revenue-focused rather than punitive, but the absence of discussion transcripts means sentiment cannot be measured beyond the sponsor’s stated intent.
Contention
The most likely points of contention are the higher tax burden on vaping and e-cigarette products, the use of a nicotine-based formula rather than a per-volume tax, and the decision to dedicate the revenue to PEIA instead of broader state purposes. Retailers, distributors, and consumers of vaping products may object to the increased cost and the fallback presumptions for unlabeled products, which could raise compliance and valuation disputes. Another possible issue is whether directing the revenue to PEIA meaningfully reduces employee premiums without undermining existing employer contribution requirements or creating a de facto subsidy structure.
Regulating the manufacture, wholesale and distribution of electronic cigarettes in this state and establishing licensure of electronic cigarette manufacturers.
Requires school districts to provide instruction on dangers of electronic cigarette usage as part of New Jersey Student Learning Standards in Comprehensive Health and Physical Education.