Office of Technology rule relating to cyber reporting
Summary
SB 252 is a technology-administration bill concerning the West Virginia Office of Technology and its rules on cyber reporting. Based on the caption, the measure appears to address how cyber incidents or cybersecurity-related information must be reported within state government, likely by updating or authorizing administrative rules governing reporting procedures, timelines, or responsible entities. The bill text itself was not available in the provided materials, so the summary is limited to the bill’s title and legislative context.
The bill’s practical effect would be to shape state cybersecurity compliance requirements for agencies and other covered entities subject to Office of Technology oversight. It likely affects state information technology operations, incident reporting protocols, and any statutes or rules that govern the handling of cyber events, data breaches, or security notifications. Depending on the rule changes, it could impose new administrative duties or clarify existing reporting obligations for state agencies and technology personnel.
Impact
SB 252 would likely amend or direct the Office of Technology’s rulemaking authority regarding cyber reporting, affecting how state agencies report cybersecurity incidents and related information. The bill may influence administrative procedures, compliance expectations, and coordination among state IT officials, agency heads, and any entities required to notify the state of cyber events. Because the full text was not provided, the precise statutes or rule sections affected cannot be identified from the available record.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record was provided, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition in the available materials. The bill’s reported status indicates it was advanced in committee as part of a committee substitute for SB 251, which suggests at least procedural support at that stage. Overall sentiment appears neutral to favorable based on its movement, but the absence of debate or roll-call data prevents a more specific assessment.
Contention
No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials. In bills of this type, potential areas of disagreement typically include the scope of reporting requirements, administrative burden on agencies, confidentiality of cyber incident information, and whether the Office of Technology should have broader rulemaking authority. However, none of those issues are confirmed here because no transcript or vote details were supplied.