West Virginia Senate Bill SB 221

West Virginia 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/26
• Refer: 1/14/26

Caption

Relating to King Coal Highway Economic Advisory Board Act

Summary

SB 221 is titled the "Relating to King Coal Highway Economic Advisory Board Act," indicating that it would address the structure, duties, or continuation of an advisory board associated with the King Coal Highway project. Because the bill text was not available in the provided materials, the specific statutory changes are not visible here, but the caption suggests the measure is focused on economic development planning and oversight tied to the highway corridor. Based on the bill title and referral to the Senate Economic Development committee, the legislation likely concerns how the state organizes advisory input for development opportunities connected to the King Coal Highway. Such a bill would typically affect state law by creating, modifying, or reauthorizing an advisory board, and by defining its membership, responsibilities, reporting duties, or relationship to state economic development agencies and local stakeholders.

Impact

The bill appears likely to affect statutes governing the King Coal Highway Economic Advisory Board and any related economic development provisions for the corridor. If enacted, it would probably change how the state coordinates planning, promotion, or advisory oversight for projects associated with the highway, potentially influencing state agencies, local governments, and regional development interests in the affected area.

Sentiment

No committee transcript or vote record was provided, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition in the available materials. The referral to the Economic Development committee suggests the bill is being treated as an economic policy measure rather than a controversial social issue, and the title implies a generally development-oriented purpose.

Contention

There are no recorded committee remarks or votes in the provided context, so specific points of contention cannot be identified. If debate occurs, likely issues would include whether the advisory board is necessary, how its members are selected, whether it has meaningful authority or only a symbolic role, and whether the state should dedicate resources to the King Coal Highway corridor versus other economic development priorities.