West Virginia 2026 Regular Session

West Virginia Senate Bill SB 213

Introduced
1/14/26  

Caption

Providing PSC jurisdiction over internet service providers

Summary

SB 213 is a bill captioned "Providing PSC jurisdiction over internet service providers." Based on the available bill context, the measure would expand the West Virginia Public Service Commission’s authority to cover internet service providers, bringing broadband or other internet service entities under state utility-style oversight. Because the full bill text is not available in the provided materials, the precise scope of regulation is unclear, but the caption indicates a jurisdictional change rather than a narrow technical amendment. If enacted, the bill would likely affect how internet service providers are regulated in West Virginia, potentially subjecting them to PSC oversight on matters such as service standards, complaints, rates, or other regulatory requirements depending on the final statutory language. It would also likely implicate existing statutes governing the PSC’s authority and the legal status of telecommunications or broadband providers under state law.

Impact

The bill would likely amend West Virginia law to extend Public Service Commission jurisdiction to internet service providers, changing the regulatory framework for broadband and related communications services. That could affect providers operating in the state by adding state oversight where they may not currently be subject to PSC regulation, and it could also alter how consumer complaints, service obligations, and possibly pricing or service quality issues are handled under state law.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition in the available materials. The bill’s caption suggests a regulatory expansion that could attract interest from consumer advocates seeking stronger oversight as well as from internet service providers concerned about added compliance burdens. On the limited record available, the bill appears to be in an early referral stage rather than a fully debated measure.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely whether internet service providers should be treated like regulated utilities under PSC authority. Supporters would likely argue that PSC oversight could improve accountability, consumer protection, and service reliability, while opponents may argue that broadband is already heavily governed by federal and market-based frameworks and that state regulation could discourage investment or create overlapping requirements. Because no transcript or vote data were provided, the specific positions of legislators or stakeholders are not documented in the available record.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

WV SB681

Providing PSC jurisdiction over internet service providers

WV HB2159

Relating to the assessment of interest on overpayments by the Bureau for Medical Services

WV HB2560

Creating Infrastructure Ready Jurisdictions

WV SB895

Relating generally to jurisdiction of PSC

WV HB2028

Relating to granting the Intermediate Court of Appeals jurisdiction to hear certified questions

WV SB921

Creating WV Medical Services Oversight and Support Act

WV SB815

Permitting access to funding for public water utilities subject to PSC's jurisdiction

WV HB2524

Providing that a municipal services user fee may not be imposed on employees of the state

WV HB2502

Establishing limitations on billing practices of Internet or telecommunications providers that fail to provide subscribed customers service for five or more days

WV HB2864

Creating a poster providing contact information and resource information on veteran benefits and services

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.