Supplemental appropriation to Department of Tourism, fund 5450
Summary
SB 1084 is a supplemental appropriation bill for the West Virginia Department of Tourism, specifically directing additional funding to fund 5450. Based on the caption, the measure appears to adjust the department’s budget for the current fiscal period rather than create a new program or change substantive tourism policy. The bill text itself was not available in the provided materials, so the precise dollar amount, funding source, and line-item uses cannot be confirmed from the record here.
In practical terms, the bill would affect state budget law by increasing or otherwise modifying appropriations available to the Department of Tourism. Supplemental appropriations are typically used to provide additional operating support, cover unanticipated expenses, or fund specific tourism-related initiatives, marketing, or administrative needs. Any impact would likely be limited to the department and the state’s appropriations framework rather than altering private rights or regulatory requirements.
Impact
SB 1084 would amend the state’s appropriations for the Department of Tourism by adding supplemental funding to fund 5450. Its legal effect is budgetary: it changes how state funds are allocated and available for tourism-related operations, but does not appear to revise substantive statutes governing tourism, businesses, or local governments. The bill’s practical impact would fall on the Department of Tourism and any programs, contracts, promotions, or administrative activities supported by that fund.
Sentiment
Because no committee transcript or vote record was provided, there is no direct evidence of debate, support, or opposition in the materials supplied. The bill’s referral to Rules on third reading suggests it advanced procedurally through the Senate, which generally indicates at least some institutional support. Overall, the available record suggests a routine appropriations measure with no documented controversy in the provided context.
Contention
No specific points of contention are identified in the provided materials because there are no committee discussions or recorded votes included. If any disagreement existed, it would most likely concern the size of the supplemental appropriation, the source of the funding, or whether the Department of Tourism should receive additional state support at that time. However, those issues are not documented in the supplied record.