Require Governor to provide at least five days notice to all state legislators when calling a Special Session
Impact
The amendment proposes to modify section 19, article VI of the state constitution, which governs the convening of the Legislature by the governor. If passed, this change would require the governor to issue a proclamation calling for a special session at least five days in advance. This change aims to enhance transparency and allow legislators more time to prepare for special sessions, which could result in more thoughtful consideration of legislative matters. It represents a shift towards more structured communication between the executive and legislative branches of the state government.
Summary
HJR6, or House Joint Resolution 6, is a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the State of West Virginia, aimed at changing the process by which the governor may convene a special session of the Legislature. Currently, the governor can call a special session at any time deemed necessary for public safety or welfare, but HJR6 stipulates that the governor must provide at least five days' notice prior to the convening of the Legislature. The resolution seeks to ensure that legislators are adequately informed and can prepare for special sessions, potentially leading to more organized and effective legislative processes.
Sentiment
Support for HJR6 appears to stem from the desire for improved communication and predictability regarding legislative sessions. Proponents argue that the five-day notice requirement will foster greater legislative accountability and preparedness. However, potential opposition may arise over concerns about the governor's ability to respond quickly to urgent matters requiring legislative action. Overall, the sentiment surrounding the bill leans towards a more organized approach to governance, though it may also highlight tensions between the need for timely legislative action and structured procedural requirements.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding HJR6 may include discussions on the necessity versus practicality of the proposed notice period. Critics might argue that in urgent situations, a five-day notice could hinder the governor's ability to respond swiftly to pressing issues. On the other hand, supporters would counter that such a rule would safeguard against last-minute legislative decisions made under pressure, thereby promoting a more thoughtful legislative process. Ultimately, these discussions underline the balance of power and communication between the branches of government.
A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.
Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.