HCR63 is a commemorative concurrent resolution requesting the West Virginia Division of Highways to name bridge number 34-001/00-006.32, locally known as the Birch River Bridge in Nicholas County, the "U.S. Army Spec 4 Gary W. Spinks Memorial Bridge." The resolution identifies the bridge by its route, location, and coordinates, and directs that signage be installed to reflect the honorary name. It also instructs the Clerk of the House to send a copy of the resolution to the Commissioner of the Division of Highways.
The resolution is primarily a tribute to Gary W. Spinks, a Vietnam veteran from Summersville who served as an infantryman in the U.S. Army, earned multiple military decorations, and later worked as a coal truck driver. The findings describe his military service, post-service life, health struggles related to combat exposure, and the request from his widow to create a lasting memorial in his honor. The measure does not create a regulatory program or alter substantive policy; it is a symbolic naming action that depends on the Division of Highways to place the memorial signs.
Impact
HCR63 does not amend the West Virginia Code or impose new legal duties on the public. Its practical effect is limited to the state highway system: it asks the Division of Highways to designate a specific bridge in Nicholas County with an honorary memorial name and to install corresponding signs. The resolution affects state transportation officials responsible for bridge naming and signage, and it creates a public memorial recognizing a veteran’s service.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment around the bill appears strongly supportive and respectful. The resolution passed the House unanimously, 97-0, indicating broad bipartisan approval and little to no opposition. The language of the resolution is laudatory and memorial-focused, emphasizing military service, sacrifice, and family remembrance.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention in the available record. Because the measure is a memorial bridge naming resolution rather than a substantive policy bill, discussion and voting appear to have been straightforward. Any interest expressed in the text centers on honoring Gary W. Spinks and fulfilling his widow’s request, rather than on competing legal or fiscal concerns.