House Concurrent Resolution 59 requests that the West Virginia Legislature recognize November 7, beginning in 2025 and each year thereafter, as Victims of Communism Memorial Day. The resolution is largely commemorative and declaratory: it sets out findings condemning communism as a political ideology and describing its historical association with repression, mass killings, and human rights abuses. It also references the federal Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation and prior national recognition of a similar observance.
The resolution directs the Clerk of the House of Delegates to transmit a copy to the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation and to post the designation on the legislature’s website. It does not create a regulatory program, appropriation, or enforcement mechanism, and it does not amend the West Virginia Code. Its practical effect is to establish an official state observance and express the Legislature’s position on the historical legacy of communist regimes.
Impact
HCR59 would not change substantive state law or impose duties on private parties or state agencies beyond the clerical actions specified in the resolution. Its legal effect is symbolic: it designates an annual commemorative day in West Virginia and authorizes public recognition through legislative channels. The measure may influence state observances, educational messaging, and official state communications, but it does not create penalties, benefits, or statutory rights.
Sentiment
The available text suggests strong support from the resolution’s sponsor and a clearly anti-communist framing. Because there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, there is no direct evidence of opposition or debate in the supplied materials. The overall sentiment is therefore best characterized as commemorative and ideologically affirmative, with the Legislature being asked to formally honor victims of communist regimes.
Contention
The main point of contention inherent in the resolution is its political and historical framing of communism, which some may view as a necessary human-rights statement and others may see as a partisan or symbolic condemnation of a broad ideology. The resolution’s findings attribute extensive atrocities to communist regimes and cite Marxist ideology and specific historical leaders, which could prompt disagreement over historical interpretation, scope, and whether the Legislature should adopt such a statement. No specific objections are documented in the provided materials, but any controversy would likely center on symbolism rather than legal effect.
Expiring funds to the unappropriated surplus balance in the State Fund, General Revenue, from the Department Revenue, State Budget Office, PEIA Rainy Day Fund