Relating to authorizing the State Auditor to promulgate a legislative rule relating to private trust companies
Summary
HB2295 authorizes the State Auditor to promulgate a legislative rule governing private trust companies. The bill does not create a new regulatory program in statute; instead, it approves a previously filed and revised administrative rule, identified as 155 CSR 12, after it was modified to address objections from the Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee.
In practical terms, the bill gives legal effect to the State Auditor’s rulemaking on how private trust companies are regulated in West Virginia. Private trust companies are specialized entities that manage trusts, often for a single family or affiliated group, and the rule would set the framework under which they operate, subject to the authority already granted in state law.
The bill’s impact on state law is narrow but important: it amends the state code section that authorizes miscellaneous agency rules so that this specific rule is approved and enforceable. It affects the State Auditor’s office and any individuals or entities seeking to form or operate a private trust company in West Virginia, as well as the trust and fiduciary services market more broadly.
Because there are no recorded committee transcripts or votes provided, the overall sentiment cannot be measured from debate or roll call history. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears largely procedural and administrative, with no evident controversy in the materials provided.
The main point of contention, if any, would likely concern the substance of the underlying rule rather than the authorizing bill itself, especially issues such as regulatory burden, oversight standards, capital or licensing requirements, and the scope of authority given to the State Auditor. No specific objections or opposing viewpoints are included in the available record.
Impact
HB2295 amends and reenacts West Virginia Code §64-9-1 to authorize a specific legislative rule from the State Auditor concerning private trust companies (155 CSR 12). The bill effectively validates the rule and makes it enforceable, thereby shaping the regulatory framework for private trust companies and the State Auditor’s oversight authority without directly rewriting the underlying substantive trust-company statutes.
Sentiment
The available record suggests a neutral, procedural sentiment. The bill appears to be an administrative rule authorization measure rather than a contested policy change, and there are no committee transcripts or votes indicating support or opposition. The fact that the rule was revised to meet objections from the Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee suggests some technical review occurred, but no broader controversy is documented here.
Contention
The only identifiable area of contention is the content of the underlying private trust company rule, not the bill’s narrow function of authorizing it. Potential concerns could include regulatory compliance costs, licensing standards, fiduciary oversight, and whether the State Auditor’s rule appropriately balances consumer protection with flexibility for trust businesses. However, the provided materials do not include any explicit objections, amendments, or recorded opposition.
Expiring funds to the unappropriated surplus balance in the State Fund, General Revenue, from the Department Revenue, State Budget Office, PEIA Rainy Day Fund