Relating to authorizing the Department of Administration to promulgate a legislative rule relating to exemptions from management services provided by the Fleet Management Division
Summary
HB2224 is a legislative rule authorization bill that allows the West Virginia Department of Administration to adopt a rule concerning exemptions from management services provided by the Fleet Management Division. The bill does not itself create a new substantive program or change the underlying fleet management statute; instead, it gives legal effect to a previously filed administrative rule, identified as 148 CSR 23, governing which entities or vehicles may be exempt from centralized fleet management services.
In practical terms, the bill confirms the Department’s authority to implement and enforce the rule as filed in the State Register on April 30, 2024. The measure is part of the Legislature’s routine oversight of agency rulemaking and is focused on administrative operations, state vehicle management, and the scope of exemptions from those services.
Impact
The bill amends and reenacts §64-2-1 of the West Virginia Code to authorize a specific legislative rule from the Department of Administration. Its effect is to validate the rule on exemptions from Fleet Management Division services, thereby affecting how state agencies and other covered entities access, use, or are exempted from centralized fleet management. The bill primarily impacts administrative law and state procurement/vehicle management practices rather than private citizens directly.
Sentiment
The available record suggests a neutral to routine administrative posture toward the bill. There are no committee transcripts, recorded votes, or other discussion snippets indicating controversy or strong support/opposition. Because the bill simply authorizes an agency rule, it appears to be a standard rule-approval measure with limited public debate.
Contention
No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials. Any potential concerns would likely center on the scope of exemptions from Fleet Management Division services, including whether the rule gives the Department of Administration too much discretion or whether certain agencies should be exempt from centralized fleet oversight. However, the record provided does not show any named opponents, supporters, or disputed provisions.
Making a supplementary appropriation to the Department of Human Services, Bureau for Medical Services – Policy and Programming and State Board of Education – State Department of Education