West Virginia 2024 Regular Session

West Virginia Senate Bill SB649

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/5/24  
Engrossed
2/20/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Enrolled
3/7/24  
Passed
3/27/24  

Caption

Clarifying per diem compensation for certain judges recalled to service

Impact

The bill seeks to address workforce shortages in the judiciary by leveraging the expertise of retired judges. It communicates a compelling state interest in maintaining a sound judicial system while introducing provisions that allow these retired individuals to serve effectively without jeopardizing their financial security. It places a limit on the maximum amount they can receive in total compensation, thereby ensuring that public funds are managed responsibly while still allowing for flexibility in the judicial workforce.

Summary

Senate Bill 649 aims to amend the Code of West Virginia regarding the per diem compensation and reimbursable expenses for certain retired judges and justices who are recalled into service. By clarifying the existing laws, the bill allows retired intermediate court judges, circuit court judges, and family court justices to receive compensation while continuing to draw their retirement benefits. This is particularly relevant as there is an increasing need for experienced judges to maintain judicial continuity and effectiveness in the state’s court system, especially in light of temporary absences due to illness or other circumstances.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 649 appears to be favorable, with a consensus reflecting the necessity of having experienced judges available to fill temporary vacancies. Proponents emphasize the importance of judicial efficiency and continuity, suggesting that the bill addresses significant gaps within the judicial branch. However, discussions may have included concerns regarding the implications of expanding post-retirement employment opportunities for judges, particularly related to the potential for conflicts of interest or the perception of judicial independence.

Contention

Some debates surrounding SB 649 could stem from concerns about the balance between allowing retired judges to serve without compromising the integrity of the judicial retirement system. The legislation offers exemptions under specific provisions, like allowing retired judges to accept per diem compensation beyond usual restrictions, which may heighten scrutiny about the potential for abuse of such allowances. The successful navigation of these concerns is critical to establishing confidence in the protective measures surrounding the reemployment of retired judicial officers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

WV SB623

Specifying circumstances in which senior judges and justices may be recalled to service

WV HB3337

Clarifying how substitute teachers may serve for extended periods.

WV HB4708

Clarifying how substitute teachers may serve for extended periods.

WV HB2890

Relating to clarifying county boards of education members’ compensation rate

WV HB5130

Relating to the additional compensation certain counties pay to judges and justices for extrajudicial services.

WV S1343

Amends existing law to provide that certain judges shall not be eligible to serve as a senior judge and may not elect to receive certain retirement compensation.

WV SB36

Clarifying requirements and compensation when assisting persons apply for VA benefits in certain circumstances

WV S427

Requires Administrative Law Judges to be enrolled in Workers Compensation Judges Part of PERS.

WV A4827

Requires Administrative Law Judges to be enrolled in Workers Compensation Judges Part of PERS.

WV HB3404

Relating to permitting a prosecuting attorney or an assistant prosecuting attorney to return to service after retirement without suspending or ending payments from his or her retirement annuity during such period of additional employment.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

TX HB1615

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning water and wastewater special districts, including a conforming amendment.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon

TX HB1620

Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.

NJ S1701

Requires legislative approval of changes to core curriculum content standards and Statewide assessments.

NJ A167

Requires legislative approval of changes to core curriculum content standards and Statewide assessments.