West Virginia House Bill HB2153

West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/22
• Refer: 1/12/22

Caption

Permitting former members of the Legislature to remain eligible for insurance plans at full cost to the member and at no cost to the state

Impact

If enacted, HB2153 will modify existing provisions of the West Virginia Public Employees Insurance Act, particularly as they relate to legislative members. By allowing former legislators to remain on insurance plans, the bill supports their transition post-legislation while ensuring that they remain financially responsible for their coverage. This change could influence the recruitment and retention of individuals in public service roles, as access to affordable healthcare is a significant consideration for potential candidates.

Summary

House Bill 2153 is a legislative measure introduced to amend the West Virginia Code. It specifically addresses the eligibility of former members of the Legislature to participate in state-sponsored insurance plans. According to the bill, former legislators can continue their insurance coverage post-service, provided they pay the full costs associated with their coverage, thus not imposing any financial burden on the state. This policy seeks to create continuity in healthcare access for former legislators while ensuring that state resources are not utilized for this purpose.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB2153 appears to be positive among those who support increased benefits for public service members. Proponents argue that offering continued health insurance options contributes to a robust support system for former legislators, which is vital given the often tumultuous nature of political careers. Critics, however, may raise concerns about the implications of extending such benefits at the potential cost of taxpayers, although the bill explicitly states that no costs will fall on the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise from the financial implications of permitting former members to participate in these insurance plans. While the bill stipulates that costs are to be paid entirely by the former legislators themselves, there may be debate over whether this practice sets a precedent for future public service benefits and how it may impact legislative budgets. Thus, the bill raises questions about the balance of providing beneficial support for former legislators while safeguarding fiscal responsibility within state budgets.