Wisconsin Senate Bill SB491

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/2/25
• Refer: 10/2/25
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

An Act to repeal 20.255 (2) (ab), 121.105 (5) and 121.91 (2m) (j) 2.; to renumber and amend 121.91 (2m) (j) 2m.; to amend 20.255 (2) (ac), 118.40 (2r) (e) 2p. a., 121.905 (3) (c) 6., 121.905 (3) (c) 9., 121.91 (2m) (j) 3., 121.91 (2m) (r) 1. b. and 121.91 (2m) (s) 1. b.; to create 20.255 (2) (ab), 121.105 (5) and 121.91 (2m) (j) 2m. b. of the statutes; Relating to: general equalization aids, supplemental hold harmless aid, the per pupil adjustment for school district revenue limits, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

The anticipated impact of SB491 on state laws includes changes to existing statutes regarding revenue limits for school districts. Notably, the bill modifies the formula for per pupil funding adjustments, linking future adjustments to inflation rates as indicated by the consumer price index (CPI). This shift ensures that funding adjustments keep pace with economic conditions, potentially providing schools with a more stable funding source that protects against inflationary pressures.

Summary

Senate Bill 491 focuses on the distribution of general equalization aids and the implementation of a supplemental hold harmless aid aimed at enhancing school district revenues. The bill proposes significant increases in state aid for education, allocating $493.8 million for the 2025-26 school year and $699.9 million for the 2026-27 school year. This financial boost aims to support schools in maintaining or exceeding their prior year's state aid levels, which is pivotal for sustaining quality education across districts in Wisconsin.

Contention

A point of contention surrounding SB491 may emerge from differing perspectives on educational funding priorities. Proponents of the bill emphasize the need for adequate funding to ensure equitable educational opportunities across districts. However, critics might argue about the sustainability of such financial commitments amidst other competing state budget needs and priorities. The allocation of substantial resources towards increased state aid could invoke discussions about fiscal responsibility and the implications for future state budgets.