Wisconsin Senate Bill SB462

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/2/25
• Refer: 10/2/25
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

An Act to repeal 103.81 (2m); to amend 102.60 (1m) (c), 103.25 (1), 103.27 (2), 103.28 (2), 103.70 (1), 103.70 (2) (a), 103.70 (2) (b) (intro.), 103.71 (1), 103.74 (intro.), 103.80 (2), 103.81 (1) and 103.81 (2); to create 103.70 (2) (c) of the statutes; Relating to: permits authorizing the employment of minors. (FE)

Impact

The introduction of SB462 could have widespread implications for state laws governing child labor and employment practices. If passed, the bill may lead to changes not only in the types of work that minors are allowed to perform but also in the hours they can work and the environments in which they can work. Supporters of the legislation argue that such measures are necessary to prepare young individuals for future employment and to ensure that businesses have access to a capable workforce. However, it may also require adjustments from both employers and educational institutions to accommodate changes in minor employment regulations.

Summary

SB462 seeks to authorize the employment of minors, revising existing laws related to child labor. The bill addresses the complexities and regulations surrounding minors entering the workforce, aiming to create a more structured and lawful framework for their employment. This includes provisions that may expand the types of jobs that minors can engage in, potentially making it easier for youth to secure work opportunities while ensuring they are employed under safe and appropriate conditions. A significant aim is to balance the need for youth work experience with protections from exploitation and unsafe working conditions.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SB462 include concerns from various advocacy groups regarding the potential risks of expanding employment opportunities for minors. Critics fear that easing regulations might lead to increased exposure to exploitative practices or hazardous working environments for young individuals. Additionally, there are discussions about whether the bill sufficiently protects minors' rights and wellbeing while allowing for flexibility in their employment opportunities. The debate also encompasses how the balance between providing work experience and ensuring safety can be maintained under the new framework proposed by SB462.