Wisconsin Senate Bill SB204

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/16/25
• Refer: 4/16/25
• Report Pass: 6/11/25
• Refer: 1/29/26
• Report Pass: 2/3/26
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

An Act to amend 71.05 (6) (a) 15., 71.10 (4) (i), 71.21 (4) (a), 71.21 (6) (d) 3., 71.26 (2) (a) 4., 71.30 (3) (f), 71.34 (1k) (g), 71.365 (4m) (d) 2., 71.45 (2) (a) 10. and 71.49 (1) (f); to create 20.835 (2) (de), 71.07 (12), 71.28 (12), 71.47 (12) and 73.03 (78) of the statutes; Relating to: creating a video game production tax credit and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

If passed, SB204 will have a significant impact on state tax law by creating a new category of tax credits specifically for video game production. Eligible claimants must operate a business in the state and maintain a physical location, which promotes both local business activity and job creation. The definition of 'video game product' is explicitly detailed in the bill, which excludes certain categories like social media and gambling, narrowing the focus to entertainment products and ensuring that public funds are directed towards production that offers broad social benefits.

Summary

Senate Bill 204 introduces a video game production tax credit designed to support the growth of the video game industry within the state. The bill provides for a refundable income and franchise tax credit, allowing businesses involved in the development and production of video games to claim a credit equal to 30% of their eligible wages and expenditures related to these activities. The credit aims to incentivize video game production in the state, fostering economic growth and job creation within this burgeoning industry.

Contention

The bill may face contention regarding its fiscal implications and the potential for misuse of the tax credit system. Some lawmakers may voice concerns about the adequacy of oversight regarding the auditing process that requires businesses to have a certified public accountant verify their claims. This aspect of compliance might be contentious, as it could be perceived as a barrier for smaller businesses or start-ups in the industry. Moreover, debates may arise around the allocation of state resources towards this industry over other sectors that could also benefit from financial support.