Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB992

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/26
• Refer: 1/30/26
• Failed: 3/23/26

Caption

An Act to amend 227.137 (3) (b) 2., 227.139 (1), 227.139 (2) (b) and 227.40 (4) (a); to create 227.11 (5) of the statutes; Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose costs. (FE)

Impact

If passed, AB992 would alter the landscape of regulatory oversight by instituting formal requirements for cost analysis on proposed administrative rules. By doing so, it would potentially limit the ability of regulatory agencies to create new rules without first demonstrating their financial viability and importance to economic sustainability. Proponents believe this will help avoid unnecessary regulatory burdens and foster a more business-friendly environment. However, critics argue that the requirement may serve as an obstacle to timely regulations that are necessary for public benefit, particularly in sectors like health and environmental safety.

Summary

AB992 is legislation aimed at establishing requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose costs on businesses or individuals. The bill emphasizes that any new rules that would result in financial burdens must be accompanied by a comprehensive cost analysis. This analysis should detail the potential economic impact of the rules and include considerations for small businesses, ensuring they are not disproportionately affected. The intent behind this measure is to promote transparency and enable more informed decision-making when it comes to new regulations that could have significant financial implications.

Contention

The discussions surrounding AB992 have highlighted several notable points of contention. Supporters, primarily from business advocacy groups, argue that the bill's provisions could lead to enhanced accountability in the regulatory process, ensuring that any potential costs are clearly outlined and considered before implementation. On the other hand, various advocacy groups express concern that the stringent requirements set forth in AB992 could hinder the government's ability to respond swiftly to public needs, such as environmental protection or public health initiatives, particularly during crises when prompt action is vital.