An Act; Relating to: revising various provisions of the statutes for the purpose of making corrections and reconciling conflicts (Correction Bill).
AB927 is a technical correction bill that revises numerous Wisconsin statutes to fix drafting errors, reconcile conflicts created by prior legislation, and update cross-references after renumbering. The bill does not create a new policy program or substantially change substantive law; instead, it makes conforming edits across many chapters of the statutes so that references point to the correct provisions and statutory structure remains internally consistent.
The bill’s changes are spread across a wide range of subject areas, including elections, local government, taxation, professional regulation, health and human services, criminal law, and administrative procedure. Many of the amendments simply renumber provisions, move subsections, or update references to reflect earlier acts, including changes to chapters 19, 66, 71, 77, 79, 115, 165, 230, 440, 448, 450, 459, 757, 948, and 949. It also reorganizes portions of chapter 448, including the structure of certain subchapters and related cross-references.
Because AB927 is a correction bill, its practical impact is to preserve legal clarity and prevent statutory conflicts or misapplication of outdated citations. It affects agencies, regulated professionals, courts, local governments, and other parties that rely on accurate statutory references, but it does not appear to impose new regulatory burdens or benefits beyond conforming the law to prior enactments.
The available legislative record shows no committee transcript and no recorded votes, so there is little evidence of controversy or debate in the materials provided. The overall sentiment appears neutral and procedural, consistent with a housekeeping bill designed to clean up the statutes rather than advance a contested policy change.
The main point of possible concern is the complexity of the bill itself: it makes many scattered technical changes across multiple statutes, which can be difficult to track and verify. Any contention would likely center on whether all cross-references and renumberings were correctly reconciled, rather than on the underlying policy choices.
AB927 amends Wisconsin statutes to correct numbering, update cross-references, and reconcile conflicts created by prior acts. Its legal effect is largely conforming and administrative: it changes how existing statutes are cited and organized, including multiple provisions in chapters 19, 66, 71, 77, 79, 115, 165, 230, 440, 448, 450, 459, 757, 948, and 949. The bill primarily affects state agencies, courts, regulated professions, local governments, and other users of the Wisconsin Statutes who depend on accurate statutory references.
The sentiment around AB927 appears neutral and noncontroversial. The bill is a correction bill with no recorded committee discussion or votes in the provided materials, suggesting it was treated as a technical housekeeping measure rather than a policy dispute. The available record does not show organized support or opposition, only the routine legislative purpose of maintaining statutory consistency.
There is no documented substantive opposition in the provided materials, but the bill’s breadth and technical complexity could raise concerns about whether all renumberings and cross-references were correctly aligned. Any contention would likely be limited to drafting accuracy, internal consistency, and the risk that a mistaken conforming change could unintentionally affect how another statute is read or applied. No specific stakeholder or ideological dispute is reflected in the record provided.